Turkey
Lawyers at Aksoy IP discuss why a delay in implementing a new procedure for cancelling trademarks in Türkiye is causing a headache for practitioners
Burak Yüceel outlines six characteristics that make a successful IP practitioner and explains why Alan Turing is an inspiration
Practitioners reveal how changes to non-use cancellations, first outlined in 2017 but yet to be formalised, are affecting their strategies
Yasemin Kenaroğlu tells us about setting up ‘IP School’, Turkish coffee, and why IP is like an iceberg
Sponsored
Sponsored
-
Sponsored by Gün and PartnersUğur Aktekin, Mutlu Yıldırım Köse and Merve Çimen Sevine of Gün and Partners consider the alternate options for trademark applicants facing problems from broad senior trademarks -
Sponsored by Gün and PartnersUğur Aktekin and Zeynep Seda Alhas of Gün and Partners explore how the disruption caused by the coronavirus pandemic affected the enforcement of trademark rights in Turkey
-
Sponsored by Gün and PartnersSelin Sinem Erciyas and Zeynep Çağla Üstün of Gün and Partners discuss the recent court decision which helps clarify Article 86 of the Turkish IP Code
-
Sponsored by Gün and PartnersThe first instance Civil Court for Intellectual and Industrial Rights (IP court) in its decision rendered in October 2020 pointed out that the use of the subject mark as a domain name solely is not deemed sufficient to prove the use of the mark as a trademark.
-
Sponsored by Gün and PartnersThis article aims to discuss similarity of goods and services in case of an opposition against a trademark application before the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office (the office).
-
Sponsored by Gün and PartnersAn IP court has accepted the discovery of evidence demand made by an originator company against a generic pharmaceutical company after the court's expert panel confirmed that patent infringement had occurred, but has then rejected the originator's request for a preliminary injunction due to the so-called Bolar exemption.
