Transfer of trademarks to the Greek Industrial Property Organisation

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Transfer of trademarks to the Greek Industrial Property Organisation

Sponsored by

patrinos-logo.png
Greece, IP, trademark

Youli Angelou of Patrinos & Kilimiris explains why the consolidation of all branches of industrial property is a welcome move

Law No. 4796/2021 (Articles 33-48, Government Gazette 63/April 17 2021) provides the transfer of the responsibilities regarding trademarks from the Directorate of the General Secretariat for Trademarks of the Ministry of Development and Investments to the Greek Industrial Property Organisation (OBI), which is supervised by the Ministry of Development and Investments. 

The responsibilities for the Greek trademark of products and services, as provided in Law No. 4072/2012 on trademarks remain in the Directorate of Trademarks of the General Secretariat for Trademarks of the Ministry of Development and Investments. Therefore, based on the new law: 

  • The OBI Is responsible for the physical (paper) and electronic register of trademarks, the trademarks archive, the information systems, the software and the corresponding systems that support the operation of the registry and the archive of the Administrative Commission for Trademarks (Article 35);

  • The OBI is designated as the competent national authority for verifying the authenticity of the final decisions of the EUIPO (Article 33§5); and

  • The OBI participates and represents Greece on trademark issues in the EUIPO, WIPO and any corresponding European or international organisation or body and is responsible for all communication and cooperation with these organisations (Article 33§7).

A Joint Ministerial Decision (JMD) of the Ministry of Development and Investments as well as of the Ministry of Finance is expected to regulate all the necessary details of the transfer of organisational, technical and practical nature to complete the transfer of the physical (paper) and electronic register of trademarks, the information and other corresponding systems that support it, the trademarks archive as well as the adequate staffing of ΟΒΙ.

The main objective of this transfer is the assumption of full responsibility by one body as well as the administrative concentration/integration of all branches of industrial property in one entity, thus aiming at a more efficient strengthening of trade. Moreover, this transfer aims at a uniform and unified national policy with regard to all industrial property rights, thus bringing Greece in line with the practice of other countries.

In view of the above, the consolidation of all branches of industrial property in one body can only bring positive results. 

 

Youli Angelou
Associate, Patrinos & Kilimiris

E: yangelou@patrinoskilimiris.com


 

 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The England and Wales appeals court handed down its judgment just seven working days after hearing the trademark dispute involving pharma company Merck
A host of law firms from across Europe and beyond helped bring the streaming technology dispute to a close
Hugues Derème, director general of the Benelux IP Office, unveils his vision for the region, how to improve IP awareness, and use of AI
A copyright win for AI firm Anthropic and a new executive order against law firm Jenner & Block were also among the top talking points this week
A principal at Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner explains how AI tools, including DeepIP, can position the firm to help clients
The firm explains why AI-empowered data analytics could make it a more efficient advocate for its clients
Penelope Aspinall, of IP wellbeing charity Jonathan’s Voice, explains why managers should take a three-tiered approach to looking after workers’ mental health
Heath Hoglund talks about the value proposition of patent pools and why it went ahead with its first-ever series of pool meetings in China
Ryan Richardson, Chris O’Brien, and Jean Selep of Sterne Kessler analyse the treatment of SEPs at the UPC and ITC and highlight why SEP holders and implementers should be mindful of current developments in both forums
A ruling concerning the UPC’s jurisdiction, questions over costs transparency, and a missed deadline by Amazon were among the top talking points this fortnight
Gift this article