Podcast: Novartis, ML&P and ex-GSK counsel on COVID pools

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Podcast: Novartis, ML&P and ex-GSK counsel on COVID pools

re-podcast-logo.png

Guests debate how patent pools could be used to ensure global access to COVID treatments and vaccines, as well as how the pandemic has changed the IP system


To listen to the podcast, which is nearly 50 minutes, click the link below.

For the first Managing IP podcast, Charlotte Kilpatrick and IP experts discussed the ramifications of the COVID-19 crisis on the patent system and how the virus could change how pharma innovators conduct research and collaborate.

A highlight was a debate on the role patent pools could play to accelerate research for COVID treatments and vaccines. Ellen 't Hoen, director of the Medicines Law and Policy research institute in the Netherlands, stressed the importance for pharma innovators to use patent pools as a way to ensure global access to the vaccines once they become available. She pointed to the example of the Medicines Patent Pool, which negotiates licences for HIV and tuberculosis medications with generics companies, which can produce treatments at an affordable cost for developing countries.

David Rosenberg, former vice president of IP policy at GSK, agreed that a patent pool could be one solution among many to ensure access, but added he doesn’t believe a pool will be the ideal way for companies to conduct business and that innovators are more confident to negotiate with generics companies they already know. 

Corey Salsberg, vice president and global head of IP affairs at Novartis in Washington DC, noted that because tackling COVID-19 could involve multiple vaccines as well as treatments for those with advanced symptoms, a single patent pool might not be the best solution to ensure access.

Enjoy the podcast. 








more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Lavoix provide an overview of the UPC’s approach to inventive step and whether the forum is promoting its own approach rather than following the EPO
Andrew Blattman, who helped IPH gain significant ground in Asia and Canada, will leave in the second half of 2026
The court ordering a complainant to rank its arguments in order of potential success and a win for Edwards Lifesciences were among the top developments in recent weeks
Frederick Lee has rejoined Boies Schiller Flexner, bolstering the firm’s capabilities across AI, media, and entertainment
Nirav Desai and Sasha S Rao at Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox explore how companies’ efforts to manage tariffs by altering corporate structures can undermine their ability to assert their patents and recover damages
Monika Żuraw, founder of Żuraw & Partners, discusses why IP should be part of the foundation of a business, and taking on projects that others walk away from
Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Susan Keston and Rachel Fetches at HGF explain why the CoA’s decision to grant the UPC’s first permanent injunction demonstrates the court’s readiness to diverge from national court judgments
IP, M&A, life sciences and competition partners advised on deal that brings together brands such as ‘Huggies’ and ‘Kleenex’ with ‘Band-Aid’ and ‘Tylenol’
Stability AI, represented by Bird & Bird, is not liable for secondary copyright infringement, though Fieldfisher client Getty succeeds in some trademark claims
Gift this article