This week in IP – Plants non-patentable (again), SCOTUS swats preclusion rule, National Geographic victorious

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

This week in IP – Plants non-patentable (again), SCOTUS swats preclusion rule, National Geographic victorious

adobestock-240034481.jpg

Managing IP rounds up the latest trademark, copyright and patent news, including some stories you might have missed

EPO rules plants not patentable in Pepper (again)

The EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal declared yesterday that plants and animals exclusively obtained by essentially biological processes are not patentable, contrary to a 2018 decision from the office’s Technical Board of Appeal that such products were eligible for patent protection.

The decision was the latest in a series of attempts over 10 years to clarify whether patent protection can be obtained for plants in Europe, and falls in line with the EPO’s guidelines from 2017 that excluded plants from patent protection.

In its opinion on case G 3/19 (Pepper), the EBoA held that under Article 53b of the European Patent Convention, the non-patentability of essentially biological processes for the production of plants or animals also extends to plant or animal products that are exclusively obtained by an essentially biological process.

To ensure legal certainty and to protect the legitimate interests of patent proprietors and applicants, the EBoA also ruled that the new interpretation of Article 53b would not have retroactive effect on European patents containing such claims that were granted before July 1 2017.

The interpretation will also not be extended to pending patent applications seeking protection for such claims that were filed before that date.

“I’m a bit surprised about this outcome from a purely legal point of view, but happy about it because this has been our business’s political position,” says Franck Coutand, former patent manager and current head of quality and safety at Limagrain, a plant breeder, in France.

Lucky for some in SCOTUS ruling

In a ruling on a nearly two-decade-old trademark dispute yesterday, the US Supreme Court decided that Marcel Fashion Groups could not preclude Lucky Brand Dungarees from raising new defences under federal preclusion principles.

However, the opinion, written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, left open the possibility that it might be suitable under certain circumstances for parties to apply claim preclusion to their defences.

“Here, however, this court need not determine when (if ever) applying claim preclusion to defences may be appropriate, because a necessary predicate – identity of claims – is lacking,” wrote Sotomayor.

Christian Liedtke, partner at Acuminis in California, says that based on the court’s unanimous opinion, it seems as though SCOTUS is at least sympathetic in principle to the idea of applying the concept of claim preclusion to defences.

National Geographic survives Wild America encounter

The US District Court for the District of Colorado last Friday dismissed, with prejudice, claims brought against National Geographic for infringing the 'Wild America' trademark.

Marty Stouffer, a producer of the wildlife and nature documentary television programme Wild America, alleged that several National Geographic programmes infringed his trademark, the name of his long-running PBS series in the 1980s and early 90s. The titles included Untamed Americas, America the Wild and Surviving Wild America. 

Stouffer had demanded tens of millions of dollars in damages. But the Colorado court found that the objective facts of the case excused further inquiry into National Geographic’s subjective motives, and that those facts established that National Geographic’s titles for the series deserved first amendment protection.

HBO counsel of 20 years goes to Spotify

Spotify has appointed WarnerMedia veteran Eve Konstan as its general counsel, replacing Horacio Gutierrez, who was promoted to head of global affairs and chief legal officer at the music streaming company.

Konstan, who most recently worked as executive vice president and general counsel at WarnerMedia Entertainment, had a career spanning 20 years at HBO.

She started at the cable network not long after the premiere of The Sopranos and was promoted to oversee legal at the WarnerMedia Entertainment portfolio just before the finale of Game of Thrones.

Konstan will provide support on legal issues at Spotify including intellectual property, litigation and risk management. She will be based in New York.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The tie-up will add around 10 US-based partners to Herbert Smith Freehills’ IP offering
Colleen Tracy James, who joined as co-chair of the life sciences patent litigation group a little over a year ago, reveals her thoughts on hiring associates and AI
OpenAI's latest arguments at the Delhi High Court and a victory for Under Armour were also among the top talking points this week
Andrea Stone explains how her in-house experience gives her a unique perspective, and why Ballard Spahr’s combination with Lane Powell made it an ideal time to join
The pair had been fighting in multiple jurisdictions but have agreed to settle all litigation
Law firms may try to relate PTAB briefs to broader economic concerns in response to the USPTO’s latest guidance
IP Inclusive’s 10-year celebration provides reasons to be positive in the face of troubling attacks against DEI initiatives
Microsoft allegedly uses the HEVC technology in a range of products and offers an extension as an add-on
A group of five lawyers who joined Cleary Gottlieb say they want to help expand the firm’s IP litigation practice
As we build up to another busy year for the IP STARS rankings and our Managing IP Awards, we assess some of the major IP firms and trends in Germany
Gift this article