This week in IP – SCOTUS streams arguments, China publishes copyright law, new German FRAND rules

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

This week in IP – SCOTUS streams arguments, China publishes copyright law, new German FRAND rules

scotusaprilcover.jpeg

Managing IP rounds up the latest patent, trademark and copyright news, including some you may have missed

SCOTUS breaks virtual ground in Booking.com

The traditionally technology-averse US Supreme Court held remote arguments for the first time on Monday in a trademark case concerning Booking.com.

The court conducted its proceedings in USPTO v Booking.com by telephone and streamed live audio, allowing the public to experience an event usually reserved for members of the public who wait in line to get into the US’s highest court, on Capitol Hill.

The arguments were reportedly made with few issues, with the exception of a delay from Justice Sonia Sotomayor as she began her questioning in the first half of the arguments.

Lawyers are now looking to the court to see if it will continue to conduct virtual proceedings once the COVID-19 shutdown comes to an end and the Supreme Court reopens for in-person meetings.

German Supreme Court sets out new FRAND rules

In a decision handed down on Wednesday that could raise the bar for rules on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms for implementers in Germany, the Federal Court of Justice ruled that home-appliance company Haier had infringed two of Sisvel’s standard essential patents.

Justice Meier Beck, one of Germany’s most renowned patent judges, made it clear that an infringer is obliged to make a concrete licence offer to an SEP owner, even under the Court of Justice of the EU’s FRAND rules set out in 2015’s Huawei v ZTE.

The implementer, he said, should demonstrate this through its overall conduct in negotiations with the SEP holder.

“It is not enough to simply declare your willingness to take a licence. You have to be more specific,” said Meier-Beck.

In a blog on this ruling, Linklaters managing associate Bolko Ehglen said the issues addressed in the case will probably cover only a small portion of the uncertainties around FRAND rules.

“In particular, one should not expect a statement from the court on what a FRAND licence is,” he said.

The written judgment on this matter is expected in a couple of weeks.

China publishes draft copyright law for comment

The National People’s Congress recently released a draft of the Copyright Law for public comment. 

The new draft sets out the availability of punitive damages of up to five times actual damages, an exponential increase in the maximum statutory damages from RMB 500,000 to RMB 5 million (roughly $708,000), and switching the burden of proof for proving damages.

Comments on the draft bill are due by June 13, and the draft will probably be reviewed again towards the end of the year or in 2021.

Managing IP published an analysis of the Chinese Copyright Law in September 2019.

USPTO launches COVID platform

The USPTO unveiled a new web-based intellectual property marketplace on Monday called Patents 4 Partnerships.

The platform has been launched to provide the public with a user-friendly and searchable repository of patents and published applications related to the COVID-19 pandemic that are indicated as available for licensing.

In a recent press release, the office said that the new platform will facilitate “the voluntary licensing and commercialisation of innovations in a variety of key technologies, and help disseminate valuable patent information”.

This announcement comes as more companies, including Microsoft, join the Open Covid Pledge, where firms publicly commit to make IP relevant to COVID-19 freely available.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article