Burberry loses check pattern mark in China

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Burberry loses check pattern mark in China

The China Trade Mark Office (CTMO) has cancelled Burberry’s trade mark on its signature tartan pattern the mark on non-use grounds

burberry.jpg

Burberry's Haymarket pattern

A Guangdong-based leather goods manufacturer Polo Santa Roberta (路必达马球皮具制品公司) filed the cancellation action, arguing that Burberry had not used its trade mark tartan pattern for three years. The CTMO sided with Polo Santa Roberta, which has been in disputes with Burberry in other jurisdictions around Asia, including Hong Kong and Taiwan. 

After the CTMO made its decision, Polo Santa Roberta held a press conference announcing the result and demanding Rmb 500 million ($82 million) in compensation based on loss of various business opportunities due to Burberry's enforcement. It also noted Burberry's continued legal actions against Polo Santa Roberta in Taiwan, and that courts there ruled in favour of Polo Santa Roberta in 2004, 2005, 2008 and 2009.

Burberry has filed an appeal with the Trademark Review and Appellate Board. In a statement, it stressed that the rights to the mark remain with the company while the matter is pending, and that the cancellation applies only to leather goods (class 18).

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article