The Indian pet food industry’s legal bite: trends, regulations, and IP hurdles

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The Indian pet food industry’s legal bite: trends, regulations, and IP hurdles

Sponsored by

rna-400px.jpg
pexels-rubenstein111rebello-8121142.jpg

India’s rapidly expanding pet food industry presents several intellectual property challenges. Ranjan Narula and Shipra Alisha Philip of RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys explore the landscape and provide insights into strategies for market players

The Indian pet food industry has grown significantly, driven by rising pet ownership, the advancement of pet humanisation, higher disposable incomes, and greater awareness of pet nutrition. According to the India Pet Food Market report (2020-2030F), the market was valued at $843.89 million in 2024 and is projected to reach $1.98 billion by 2030. This article explores key industry trends, the regulatory frameworks, intellectual property (IP) challenges, and possible solutions.

Recent trends in the Indian pet food industry

The following trends are currently prominent in the Indian pet food industry:

  • A shift from home-cooked food to packaged food;

  • Premiumisation – there is an increasing demand for organic, grain-free, and breed-specific diets;

  • A rise of domestic brands – indigenous manufacturers offer innovative, cost-effective alternatives to imports;

  • E-commerce and direct-to-consumer expansion – online platforms provide greater accessibility, with specialised retailers and vet clinics enhancing product offerings;

  • Functional and health-focused diets – there is a growing demand for pet food enriched with probiotics, supplements, and therapeutic formulations;

  • Sustainable practices – pet owners generally favour eco-friendly packaging and sustainably sourced ingredients; and

  • Evolving pet demographics – while dog ownership remains dominant, cat adoption is surging (an 88.2% increase from 2017–22) due to urban living preferences.

Regulatory framework governing pet food in India

The pet food industry is governed by the following laws and regulations:

IP challenges faced by pet food companies – and possible solutions

Brand conflicts and trademark/trade dress infringement

Pet food companies often face conflicts when their trademarks resemble existing brands. Competitors may imitate packaging, colours, or product presentation to mislead consumers. Before launching, businesses should conduct comprehensive clearance searches on the Indian Trade Marks Registry, domain name registries, and e-commerce platforms to avoid infringement lawsuits and rebranding or redesigning costs.

Companies should register trademarks early, ensuring easier enforcement against third-party infringers. While unregistered trademarks hold common law protection, registered trademarks provide a legal presumption of ownership, simplifying enforcement. Additionally, trademark registration aids in preventing counterfeits, as customs authorities can seize infringing goods at import-export.

Patent disputes and trade secret disclosures

Patent disputes and trade secret disclosures are rising in the competitive pet food industry, driven by innovations in formulations and processes targeting health issues such as digestion and obesity.

To protect IP, companies can register patents, use non-disclosure agreements with partners, and enforce non-compete clauses to prevent employee knowledge sharing. While regulations may require ingredient transparency, companies can safeguard proprietary formulas by offering broad descriptions and focusing on brand differentiation rather than detailed disclosures.

Counterfeiting

Fake products can damage brand reputation and pose health risks for pets. Solutions include using serialisation, embedded micro-holes, microtext, UV and infrared inks, synthetic tagging, highly secure QR codes, or blockchain for product authentication. To monitor counterfeit pet foods, regular market surveys help to trace their origin. Once identified, trademark owners can seek an ex parte injunction to seize fake products. If the counterfeiter is hard to identify or operates from temporary locations, John Doe orders can be obtained for further action.

To prevent counterfeit imports in India, IP owners can register their trademarks with the customs authority under the Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007 and the Customs Act, 1962, which enables the inspection and seizure of counterfeit goods at the border.

Counterfeiting on e-marketplaces is common due to the lack of physical inspections. When counterfeit pet food listings are found, brand owners should issue take-down notices. E-marketplaces, as intermediaries under the IT Act, must exercise due diligence by ensuring sellers do not infringe IP rights. Some platforms, such as Amazon, offer anti-counterfeiting measures, including brand registry programs for trademark owners to remove violations.

India’s pet food industry thrives on innovation, but strong IP protection and regulatory compliance are essential. Balancing these elements will drive sustainable growth.

Fraudulent websites

There has been an increase in fraudulent websites having similar domain names, layouts, and look-and-feel to the websites of legitimate pet food brands. A domain name complaint can help to have such fraudulent domains cancelled or transferred to the rightful owner. Complaints can be filed under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for global domains or the .IN Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for India, offering a non-litigation arbitration process.

Unauthorised sale of original goods and parallel imports

Parallel imports, or grey market goods, are genuine products imported without the IP owner’s permission. In India, the courts have allowed parallel imports, and IP rights are exhausted once products are sold. However, brand owners can restrict unauthorised sales if product quality or after-sales service is compromised.

The brand owners can rely upon the provisions of the Pet Food Products of Animal Origin (Import into India) Order, 2008 to stop unauthorised importations. Monitoring discrepancies in refund/return policies, packaging, advertising/promotional methods, quality control, pricing and presentation, removal of codes, and other aspects can help to prevent such sales.

Product disparagement

Product disparagement often arises from comparative advertising. While such advertising is allowed, it must not mislead, unfairly disadvantage competitors, or violate honest trade practices under Section 30 (1) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Brand owners must ensure advertisements do not disparage competitors, especially when agencies unknowingly use competitor products or fail to follow proper measures, leading to legal issues. Careful advertisement design should emphasise product differences without disparaging competitors.

Geographic IP protection and international challenges

IP laws vary across countries, making enforcement difficult. Companies should register their IP assets in key markets such as India that hold high growth potential, and work with legal experts to navigate region-specific IP regulations.

The outlook for the Indian pet food industry


The pet food industry has huge growth potential in India, with increased pet ownership, the humanisation of pets, and advancements in veterinary care among the factors driving the industry. With innovation in tech-driven solutions that monitor a pet’s health, and a movement to sustainable pet foods made from alternative proteins, there is no shortage of groundbreaking ideas that could shape the future.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Andrea Stone explains how her in-house experience gives her a unique perspective, and why Ballard Spahr’s combination with Lane Powell made it an ideal time to join
The pair had been fighting in multiple jurisdictions but have agreed to settle all litigation
Law firms may try to relate PTAB briefs to broader economic concerns in response to the USPTO’s latest guidance
IP Inclusive’s 10-year celebration provides reasons to be positive in the face of troubling attacks against DEI initiatives
Microsoft allegedly uses the HEVC technology in a range of products and offers an extension as an add-on
A group of five lawyers who joined Cleary Gottlieb say they want to help expand the firm’s IP litigation practice
As we build up to another busy year for the IP STARS rankings and our Managing IP Awards, we assess some of the major IP firms and trends in Germany
Florina Firaru discusses making new connections, the art of flower arranging, and the biggest misconception about IP
The firm, which appointed three IP partners from A&O Shearman, wants to develop a tier one practice in Europe
The England and Wales appeals court handed down its judgment just seven working days after hearing the trademark dispute involving pharma company Merck
Gift this article