Ericsson v Lenovo FRAND ruling increases ‘sovereign conflict’

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ericsson v Lenovo FRAND ruling increases ‘sovereign conflict’

Bucharest/Romania - 08.18.2020: Ericsson logo on a office building in Bucharest. Ericsson is a Swedish multinational networking and telecommunications company headquartered in Stockholm.
Credit: Cristi / Adobe Stock

The US Federal Circuit has vacated a district court decision denying Lenovo an anti-suit injunction and experts believe it has global implications

Unlock this content.

The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.

To unlock this content:

Take a Free Trial or Login
more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Firms reveal how they help clients manage the costs of multi-patent lawsuits and what impact these disputes have on how companies assign work
A former Fish & Richardson attorney explains why his new firm’s offering led him to make his first-ever move
The case concerns whether the company’s subsidiaries paid Coca-Cola’s US parent company enough for the right to use its IP, including trademarks
Igor Simoes discusses how to juggle multiple projects and why individuals who create groundbreaking technologies inspire him
In the latest UPC update, we review the NanoString and iMop rulings, a big move in London and a decision on whether a patent pool administrator can intervene
The bank announced that its AI and machine learning patents and applications have increased by 94% in the past two years
Niall Trainor, managing attorney at Hasbro, says brands could boost their business with careful portfolio culling
A decision by the Paris Central Division will lead to more IP work for outside counsel, say sources
Courts are encouraged to deliver judgments within three months of a trial, but that deadline has been missed in several recent cases
Gift this article