Zara trademark saga: the Greek head comes to the surface

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Zara trademark saga: the Greek head comes to the surface

Sponsored by

patrinos-logo.png
church-6982224.jpg

Manolis Metaxakis of Patrinos & Kilimiris reports on a notable judgment in the Zara trademark dispute, highlighting a radical provision in the relevant Greek legislation and the ruling’s alignment with EU case law

The dispute between Inditex, the Spanish fashion group, and Ffauf Italia SpA, the Italian food producer, has, not surprisingly, a Greek head as well. It is well known, after all, that the dispute resembles the Lernaean Hydra. In Greece, Inditex sought to have some of Ffauf’s national trademark registrations, relating to ‘Pasta Zara’, revoked on the basis of non-use.

The specialised division on intellectual property matters of the Athens Court of Appeal delivered a judgment in this respect on July 11 2024. Setting aside the legacy of the dispute, this judgment is notable because it is the fruit of the most radical provision of the Greek Law on Trademarks, No. 4679/2020.

According to that provision, all decisions on invalidity and revocation actions (but not on oppositions) filed and decided at the administrative level – that is to say, before/by the Hellenic Industrial Property Organisation – shall be reviewed by the civil courts; i.e., by the specialised divisions on intellectual property matters of the first-instance court and the Athens Court of Appeal.

As regards the merits of the case, the court emphasised that when assessing whether use of the trademark is genuine, regard must be had to all the facts and circumstances to assess whether the commercial exploitation of the mark in the course of trade is real. The court also clarified that it is sufficient that a trademark has been used during a part of the five-year period applicable for the trademark not to be subject to the sanctions of revocation.

Finally, it was held that the use of a trademark by a company that is economically linked to the proprietor of the mark is presumed to be use of that mark with the consent of the proprietor and is therefore to be deemed to constitute use by the proprietor.

This is in full line with EU case law, which served as a basis for the court to provide a well-reasoned judgment, bearing in mind that the court had to consider several types of evidence to assess whether the use concerned amounts to genuine use of the trademark registrations challenged.

It seems that the Greek legislator had a point with the aforementioned reform, which is good news for all cases, either with a domestic or international flair.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Tilleke & Gibbins topped the leaderboard with four awards across the region, while Anand & Anand and Kim & Chang emerged as outstanding domestic firms
News of a new addition to Via LA’s Qi wireless charging patent pool, and potential fee increases at the UKIPO were also among the top talking points
The keenly awaited ruling should act as a ‘call to arms’ for a much-needed evolution of UK copyright law, says Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard
Gift this article