Law firm innovation: it’s not all about technology

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Law firm innovation: it’s not all about technology

Sponsored by

twobirds-400px.jpg
ai-generated-8751655.jpg

Jade Thompson of Bird & Bird IP Services, wholly owned by Bird & Bird LLP, discusses the importance of innovative approaches to legal services provision and whether legal tech is the only way forward

Client buying behaviour has changed tremendously in the past few years, with purchasing decisions becoming more competitive and, at the same time, more nuanced. Changes in the needs and wants of clients, new entrants in the legal services space, and the development of legal tech are driving firms to become more innovative. These shifting market dynamics are forcing law firms, which have generally been more conservative, to reimagine the way in which they offer and deliver their services.

There is a tendency to assume innovation means technology, but while this is an important aspect, it is not the sole consideration: innovation must be understood in the broadest sense. In some ways, technology is the ‘easy’ answer.

Firms need to adopt an innovation mindset, embedded within the firm culture, thus undertaking a constant pursuit rather than a one-off activity. Only by adopting this mindset can innovation be applied to all aspects of the engagement operating model: people, process, and technology. The degree to which each of these building blocks is optimally leveraged flexes according to the specific engagement and client objectives. This approach results in long-term benefits for the client and an efficient, optimised legal partner.

As we know, brand owners are busier than ever. Under ever-increasing pressure to free up internal resources to take on more, while also optimising external legal spend, clients are looking for legal partners that can help them to meet these objectives. Whether it is a one-stop shop or a specific one-off need, clients are looking for reliable, high-quality output delivered in a cost-effective manner.

Some practical examples might include:

  • Enabling streamlined collaboration on common platforms;

  • Appointing one firm to manage on a regional or global basis, enabling cross-border, bigger-picture thinking that can be better aligned to the strategic business objectives; and

  • Streamlining or outsourcing high-volume administrative or operational activities.

The ‘right resources, right task’ approach

Bird & Bird believes in a ‘right resources, right task’ approach. The firm has been putting this into action for more than 10 years. A dedicated support operation underpins its global brand management practice and brings together a range of intellectual property (IP) specialists, including paralegals and administrators, project managers, technologists, and other operational experts. This approach has proven to be highly beneficial to clients.

Positioning the firm as a commercial, strategic partner rather than simply a legal partner is essential. Lawyers need to offer value for money and focus on the specific needs of their clients rather than taking a ‘one size fits all’ approach. With information readily available, different pricing models can be easily compared, there is increased willingness to change firms for a better ‘fit’, and there is a higher demand for ‘glocal’ – global outlook with local expertise.

There is also less focus on where the work is performed and more focus on whether the chosen method utilises the best available means; i.e., right resources, right task. Put simply, sometimes the answer is people, sometimes technology, and sometimes a combination of both. At the heart of Bird & Bird’s approach is transparency, accountability, and creativity, enabling the firm to provide greater efficiency and cost control, while retaining the highest standard of work.

Getting to know the client is key: how they prefer to work, what their goals are, understanding their risk appetite, and so on, as well as understanding how to bring meaningful value to them.

It is important to really listen to them; do not come with preconceived notions, and be honest about challenges, while also bringing solutions to the table. This attitude is vital to driving innovation forward in a mutually beneficial way. For example, if a new technological solution would be a game changer for a client, but the client data is a barrier to success, be clear about the problem and articulate the solution.

Only once a detailed understanding of the client is established can the ideal delivery model be structured, both from an operational and cost-efficiency perspective. By transforming the way in which Bird & Bird delivers IP services, the firm’s clients continue to receive access to world-class legal advice while efficiently managing the costs related to some of the more burdensome activities associated with their IP portfolios.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, ELTEMATE
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
The chief technology officer remit, which has been created as the firm is building its litigation team, will include expanding the use of AI in patent and legal work and automating manual processes
Former Hoyng Rokh Moneiger partner Laura Alonso, who brought her team to ECIJA in March, discusses plans to expand further and why ECIJA’s ‘IP DNA’ is helping broaden her work
Amita Haylock discusses building an integrated Asia practice as clients increasingly demand that firms combine IP, technology and data expertise
François Pochart, Grégoire Desrousseaux and Lionel Martin, long-standing figures in the firm’s patent litigation team, are set to help launch a Paris-based litigation offering
The Unitary Patent has passed 100,000 registrations, but new data raises the question of whether 30% uptake is a ceiling or a staging post for further growth, say Michael Nielsen and Darren Smyth of EIP and Andrew Samm at Patently
The new generation of in-house IP leaders want commercial judgment, accessibility and flexibility, with AI raising expectations around both fees and delivery
Gift this article