Five minutes with…James Tumbridge, Keystone Law

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Five minutes with…James Tumbridge, Keystone Law

James-Tumbridge-Website.jpg

James Tumbridge talks about advising the government on AI and why his day could start with the police and end with legal networking

Someone asks you at a party what you do for a living. What do you say?

I’m a tech and brand lawyer, who also does some work with the government.

Talk us through a typical working day.

I’m not sure I have a typical day. An illustrative day might be a review of overnight messages, followed by an early morning briefing with London’s police and licensing team on events and issues in the City of London.

Then I work on client files preparing for disputes or advising on issues. Typically, the day will have a mixture of in-person and online meetings with people from around the world. We could be talking about the development of artificial intelligence (AI) policy, a patent dispute, or data protection compliance. It is a wonderfully varied practice.

I might have a meeting with government officials over lunch, and then return to the usual work for clients in the afternoon, in the evening I could be at a networking event, a civic function, or maybe I will get to go home and have dinner with my family!

What are you working on at the moment?

I have been advising the UK government on an AI treaty and law reform on the use of data. I’m also working on a patent invalidity lawsuit and advising a global tech company on data protection compliance. I’m also working on matters concerning trademarks, licensing agreements, an IP transfer, copyright infringement, and some contractual disputes, as well regulatory work.

Does one big piece of work usually take priority or are you juggling multiple things?

Time management is key, I am always involved in multiple matters. The priority has to be based on the need, and at times some things, particularly court litigation or sitting as a part-time judge, take up the majority of my time. 

What is the most exciting aspect of your role and what is the most stressful?

The sheer breadth of technology and business interests, or reputational issues (often for important current events) means it is never dull! I think knowing how important a good resolution for clients is can be stressful, as can wondering what you will be doing next week and not knowing what you can safely plan to do!

Tell us the key characteristics that make a successful IP lawyer/practitioner.

This is probably the hardest question you pose. There are so many angles for a potential answer. I would say you need to be curious, thorough, and willing to work hard. You also need to be able to seamlessly move between quite a technical conversation on law or technology to a more understandable everyday language conversation with ease. The ability to distil and explain the issues, problems, and solutions, is very important.

What is the most common misconception about IP?

That you can freely use everything you can find online! Or perhaps it is whether the UK is really a first-to-file patent jurisdiction, but explaining that does not fit with a five-minute interview!

What or who inspires you?

Interesting principled people, and trying to leave my community in a better place than I found it.

If you weren’t in IP, what would you be doing?

In the military.

Any advice you would give your younger self?

There were one or two people I shouldn’t have trusted, but generally, I think the path we follow in life, including its mistakes, is what makes us who we are. My advice is just to always do what you think is right.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Pierre Pérot rejoins the firm he left in 2022 alongside another returning lawyer, associate Camille Abba
Vaping dispute, in which Stobbs and Brandsmiths are the representatives, tested how the UK's Human Rights Act can apply to injunctions restraining unjustified threats
An AI platform being sold for £40m, and lateral hires involving law firms Womble Bond Dickinson and Cadwell Thomas were among the top talking points
With the London Annual Meeting behind us, we look back at some of the lessons learned this week and ahead to what 2027 will bring
In-house counsel aren’t impressed with law firms’ international networks, but practitioners say they are crucial for business
Publication of the UPC’s annual report and adoption of the procedural rules of the Patent Mediation and Arbitration Centre were also among major developments
With the INTA Annual Meeting drawing to a close, we asked attendees for their top tips on how to close business after a meeting
Senior UK judges discussing the impact of AI on the judiciary, and the role of in-house IP lawyers during corporate transactions and carve-outs were among the top talking points
Tarun Khurana, founding partner of Khurana & Khurana, discusses juggling tasks, why every hour has a value, and the importance of ‘trusting the process’
Annual Meeting hears that IP firms are targeting hires with technical literacy in a fragmented landscape, and that those that build an online presence will distinguish themselves from the digital chaos
Gift this article