Five mins with… Tilman Müller-Stoy, Bardehle Pagenberg

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Five mins with… Tilman Müller-Stoy, Bardehle Pagenberg

csm_tilman-mueller-stoy-bardehle-pagenberg-0873_eeb5b1f531.jpg

Tilman Müller-Stoy reveals why he never made it as a footballer and how he could have had an alternative career as a fire juggler

Welcome to the latest instalment of Managing IP’s ‘Five minutes with’ series, where we learn more about IP practitioners on a personal as well as a professional level. This time we have Tilman Müller-Stoy, partner at Bardehle Pagenberg in Germany.

Someone asks you at a party what you do for a living. What do you say? 

“I am a lawyer” does not fly as an icebreaker. Instead, I opt for: "Hi, I am a translator and designer [translating technology into patent law and designing general strategic concepts into a tailor-made strategy for an actual case with a dose of creativity].

Talk us through a typical working day. 

6 am: review emails that came in overnight and send urgent responses (children still in bed)

7.45 am: Take children to school/kindergarten

8.30 am: At my desk, client calls (Asia), team meetings, emails, and some drafting.

12.30: Lunch

1.30 pm: Main drafting time

3 pm: Lots of client calls (US, Europe), emails, further drafting

8 pm: Administrative work for the firm and voluntary work for LESI, LES Germany, the Technical University of Munich.

9/10 pm: Home

What are you working on at the moment? 

Many exciting patent litigation cases at the Unified Patent Court (intense pace) and in Germany. I’m also working on several patent/standard-essential patent (SEP) licensing projects as the lead negotiator or negotiator behind the scenes. I’m also doing marketing work at the firm with a focus on UPC business development; hiring and training the next generation of hungry patent litigators.

Does one big piece of work usually take priority or are you juggling multiple things? 

My “problem” is too many big pieces of work, so there is no alternative but “juggling” (with burning balls in the air that shouldn’t be dropped). In fact, now that I am contemplating this, “juggler” might be a nice alternative for the 'what do you do for a living?' party icebreaker.

I am so grateful that I have the best team on the planet by my side, without my colleagues I would simply be lost. I am the lead counsel on more than 100 patent litigation cases in parallel, including more than 30 UPC cases, in addition to my licensing/SEP projects.

What is the most exciting aspect of your role and what is the most stressful?

Everything and everything. My key driver is international, strategic work – it is a joy and mind-broadening to work with intelligent people from different cultures and backgrounds.

The most stressful, yet still very rewarding part, is the actual trial work with other clients requiring real-time attention.

Tell us the key characteristics that make a successful IP lawyer/practitioner. 

There are so many skills that are needed. Listen, listen, listen, anticipate, and be prepared. Stay calm and humble. Be quick on your feet, proactive, and creative. Remain strategic and never lose sight of the commercial objectives of the client no matter what.

What is the most common misconception about IP?

That it unduly restricts competition – the opposite is true! IP furthers innovation for the benefit of everyone – think of COVID vaccines, the internet of things, and green tech as recent examples.

What or who inspires you?

A lot of people and things (sometimes the little ones). But there is a key person: my wife. She is the love of my life, my backbone and friend, partner in crime, the perfect mother, and still successfully works as an IVF physician in parallel – you really should ask her how to do proper “juggling”! She does all that with a smile and empathy and she manages somehow to put me at rest.

Another woman who is an inspiration in so many respects, including law, is Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

If you weren’t in IP, what would you be doing? 

Well, hard to say – my football career never got off the ground due to an incredible lack of talent.

Nowadays, I feel an increasing desire to give back so, at some point, I might look into human rights, democracy protection, or similar things provided that I find the right crowd to run with. I always need great people around me to make something happen.

Any advice you would give your younger self? 

Be hungry and aware, yet take your time, step by step, and don’t hurry. It’s going to be good in the end if you just let your passion flow. There are opportunities everywhere and the trick is to be open and ready to pick them up.

Most importantly: be selective and let some opportunities go, you can’t have them all.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deals between five more law firms and President Trump and an antitrust lawsuit against Amgen were also among the top talking points this week
US counsel explain how they win new cleantech IP business and how they’re navigating the industry’s challenges
Leaders at the IP firms, which have joined forces with backing from a PE investor, share their vision of building the number one pan-European IP practice
Firms will steer clients towards other ways of getting quicker examinations, but fear the ramifications of the USPTO’s decision
Melissa Haapala added that returning to client advocacy and the chance to work on patent litigation were reasons for returning to private practice
Michelle Clark, who has a generalist litigation background, plans to focus on IP disputes at Alston & Bird
Philips and Vivo have entered into a licensing agreement, putting an end to a five-year-old telecom SEP dispute in India
Stefan Müller discusses managing deadlines, the importance of reflection, and why IP is more than just a 'nice to have'
The three founders of the IP firm’s new US offering say they plan to offer a unique proposition in a market fixated by the billable hour
The opinion provides useful guidance when it comes to how courts might consider contributory infringement, DMCA claims, and other issues in AI copyright cases
Gift this article