Five mins with… Tilman Müller-Stoy, Bardehle Pagenberg

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Five mins with… Tilman Müller-Stoy, Bardehle Pagenberg

csm_tilman-mueller-stoy-bardehle-pagenberg-0873_eeb5b1f531.jpg

Tilman Müller-Stoy reveals why he never made it as a footballer and how he could have had an alternative career as a fire juggler

Welcome to the latest instalment of Managing IP’s ‘Five minutes with’ series, where we learn more about IP practitioners on a personal as well as a professional level. This time we have Tilman Müller-Stoy, partner at Bardehle Pagenberg in Germany.

Someone asks you at a party what you do for a living. What do you say? 

“I am a lawyer” does not fly as an icebreaker. Instead, I opt for: "Hi, I am a translator and designer [translating technology into patent law and designing general strategic concepts into a tailor-made strategy for an actual case with a dose of creativity].

Talk us through a typical working day. 

6 am: review emails that came in overnight and send urgent responses (children still in bed)

7.45 am: Take children to school/kindergarten

8.30 am: At my desk, client calls (Asia), team meetings, emails, and some drafting.

12.30: Lunch

1.30 pm: Main drafting time

3 pm: Lots of client calls (US, Europe), emails, further drafting

8 pm: Administrative work for the firm and voluntary work for LESI, LES Germany, the Technical University of Munich.

9/10 pm: Home

What are you working on at the moment? 

Many exciting patent litigation cases at the Unified Patent Court (intense pace) and in Germany. I’m also working on several patent/standard-essential patent (SEP) licensing projects as the lead negotiator or negotiator behind the scenes. I’m also doing marketing work at the firm with a focus on UPC business development; hiring and training the next generation of hungry patent litigators.

Does one big piece of work usually take priority or are you juggling multiple things? 

My “problem” is too many big pieces of work, so there is no alternative but “juggling” (with burning balls in the air that shouldn’t be dropped). In fact, now that I am contemplating this, “juggler” might be a nice alternative for the 'what do you do for a living?' party icebreaker.

I am so grateful that I have the best team on the planet by my side, without my colleagues I would simply be lost. I am the lead counsel on more than 100 patent litigation cases in parallel, including more than 30 UPC cases, in addition to my licensing/SEP projects.

What is the most exciting aspect of your role and what is the most stressful?

Everything and everything. My key driver is international, strategic work – it is a joy and mind-broadening to work with intelligent people from different cultures and backgrounds.

The most stressful, yet still very rewarding part, is the actual trial work with other clients requiring real-time attention.

Tell us the key characteristics that make a successful IP lawyer/practitioner. 

There are so many skills that are needed. Listen, listen, listen, anticipate, and be prepared. Stay calm and humble. Be quick on your feet, proactive, and creative. Remain strategic and never lose sight of the commercial objectives of the client no matter what.

What is the most common misconception about IP?

That it unduly restricts competition – the opposite is true! IP furthers innovation for the benefit of everyone – think of COVID vaccines, the internet of things, and green tech as recent examples.

What or who inspires you?

A lot of people and things (sometimes the little ones). But there is a key person: my wife. She is the love of my life, my backbone and friend, partner in crime, the perfect mother, and still successfully works as an IVF physician in parallel – you really should ask her how to do proper “juggling”! She does all that with a smile and empathy and she manages somehow to put me at rest.

Another woman who is an inspiration in so many respects, including law, is Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

If you weren’t in IP, what would you be doing? 

Well, hard to say – my football career never got off the ground due to an incredible lack of talent.

Nowadays, I feel an increasing desire to give back so, at some point, I might look into human rights, democracy protection, or similar things provided that I find the right crowd to run with. I always need great people around me to make something happen.

Any advice you would give your younger self? 

Be hungry and aware, yet take your time, step by step, and don’t hurry. It’s going to be good in the end if you just let your passion flow. There are opportunities everywhere and the trick is to be open and ready to pick them up.

Most importantly: be selective and let some opportunities go, you can’t have them all.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

In other news, Ericsson sought a declaratory judgment against Acer and Netflix filed a cease-and-desist letter against ByteDance over AI misuse
As trade secret filings rise due to AI development and economic espionage concerns, firms are relying on proactive counselling to help clients navigate disputes
IP firm leaders share why they remain positive in the face of falling patent applications from US filers, and how they are meeting a rising demand from China
The power of DEI to swing IP pitches is welcome, but why does it have to be left so late?
Mathew Lucas has joined Pearce IP after spending more than 25 years at Qantm IP-owned firm Davies Collison Cave
Exclusive survey data reveals a generally lax in-house attitude towards DEI, but pitches have been known to turn on a final diversity question
Managing IP will host a ceremony in London on May 1 to reveal the winners
Abigail Wise shares her unusual pathway into the profession, from failing A-levels to becoming Lewis Silkin’s first female IP partner
There are some impressive AI tools available for trademark lawyers, but law firm leaders say humans can still outthink the bots
Lawyers at Simmons & Simmons look ahead to a UK Supreme Court hearing in which the court will consider whether English courts can determine FRAND terms when the licence is offered by an intermediary rather than an SEP owner
Gift this article