Are TikTok works protected by Mexico’s Federal Copyright Law?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Are TikTok works protected by Mexico’s Federal Copyright Law?

Sponsored by

olivares-400px.jpg
smartphone-5503211.png

With TikTok videos frequently using music created by popular artists and adding a personal touch to trends, Jaime Ortega of OLIVARES answers a central question regarding whether the videos constitute original creations or reproductions

Article 94 of Mexico’s Federal Copyright Law (FCL) defines audiovisual works as those expressed by means of associated images, with or without incorporated sound, which are perceptible, by means of technical devices, producing a movement sensation.

TikTok is a social network that allows the user to create a video (a TikTok; i.e., an audiovisual work), which is generally short, and then upload it to the user's profile on the app, to interact with other users of the social network.

'Influencers' (and users without many followers) upload TikToks of themselves dancing, singing, acting, reviewing books or movies, promoting a brand, showing their daily life, etc.; in short, almost any activity.

TikToks can be set to music, with songs that usually are on trend. Thus, they may come into conflict with the patrimonial rights of the author’s song. In other words, the user can incorporate a different work in their TikTok.

Users can join ‘trends’, which are national or international trends in the social network created by TikTok users, and are then able to give a personal touch to the trend.

Therefore, it is worth asking whether TikToks are truly original or whether they are reproductions or transformations of a previous TikTok. In other words, is a TikTok an original or a derivative work? In this regard, the works protected by the FCL are those of original creation that are susceptible to being disclosed or reproduced in any form or media and their protection is granted from the moment they have been fixed in a material support, regardless of the merit, destination, or the method of expression.

Therefore, Tik Toks are audiovisual works protected by the FCL. Regardless of their registration with the National Copyright Institute, when fixed on a material support and according to their originality, they will be more or less protected by the FCL, without disregarding a third-party copyright that may be involved in a TikTok.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Tilleke & Gibbins topped the leaderboard with four awards across the region, while Anand & Anand and Kim & Chang emerged as outstanding domestic firms
News of a new addition to Via LA’s Qi wireless charging patent pool, and potential fee increases at the UKIPO were also among the top talking points
The keenly awaited ruling should act as a ‘call to arms’ for a much-needed evolution of UK copyright law, says Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard
Lawyers at Lavoix provide an overview of the UPC’s approach to inventive step and whether the forum is promoting its own approach rather than following the EPO
Andrew Blattman, who helped IPH gain significant ground in Asia and Canada, will leave in the second half of 2026
The court ordering a complainant to rank its arguments in order of potential success and a win for Edwards Lifesciences were among the top developments in recent weeks
Frederick Lee has rejoined Boies Schiller Flexner, bolstering the firm’s capabilities across AI, media, and entertainment
Nirav Desai and Sasha S Rao at Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox explore how companies’ efforts to manage tariffs by altering corporate structures can undermine their ability to assert their patents and recover damages
Monika Żuraw, founder of Żuraw & Partners, discusses why IP should be part of the foundation of a business, and taking on projects that others walk away from
Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Gift this article