Breaking: European Parliament backs SEP reform

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Breaking: European Parliament backs SEP reform

European Union flag against European Parliament

The European Parliament has voted in favour of overhauling the SEP framework, a proposal that has sparked deep division among patent owners and implementers

The European Parliament today, February 28, voted in favour of the European Commission’s plan to overhaul the framework for standard-essential patents.

Under the rules, the EUIPO, which is responsible for EU trademarks and designs, would operate a public register of SEPs, test their essentiality, and determine fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory royalties for implementers to pay patent owners.

SEP owners would be barred from enforcing their patents in court while the EUIPO-led process, mooted to take nine months, is ongoing.

The final vote was 454 in favour and 83 against, with 78 abstentions.

The proposals have caused deep divisions among SEP owners and implementers.

SEP owners believe that implementing companies, such as Lenovo and Apple, attempt to delay licensing negotiations while continuing to use the relevant SEPs. Implementers say they are charged unfair rates by SEP owners, who have benefitted from a lack of transparency by not having to make licensing terms public.

Concerns have also been raised about the role of the EUIPO, which currently has no experience of dealing with patents. However, in an interview with Managing IP, the EUIPO’s executive director João Negrão said the office could handle anything that comes its way. 

Talks will now proceed between the Council of the EU and the commission and there could yet be further roadblocks in place.

Several member states on the council have signalled their disapproval, while there is the added factor that there are European elections in June.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
Gift this article