Getty v Stability AI: UK judge tees up seminal AI trial

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Getty v Stability AI: UK judge tees up seminal AI trial

Rolls 2k-comp.jpg

Mrs Justice Joanna Smith identified inconsistencies between evidence given by Stability AI’s CEO and comments he made in the media

Getty Images’ copyright lawsuit against the developers of generative artificial intelligence tool Stable Diffusion will go to trial after a UK judge found some of the claims had a real chance of success.

In a decision issued on Friday, December 1, Mrs Justice Joanna Smith at the England and Wales High Court rejected Stability AI’s request to throw out Getty’s claims on summary judgment.

According to the lawsuit, Stability AI, which created Stable Diffusion, had scraped “millions of images” from Getty’s library of stock images and used them to train its AI tool.

Mohammad Mostaque, CEO of UK-based Stability AI, told the court the case shouldn’t be heard in the UK because no employees there had ever worked on Stable Diffusion.

In her judgment, however, Smith pointed out that Mostaque had claimed in an interview that the company had brought Russian and Ukrainian software developers to the UK to work on its products, potentially including Stable Diffusion.

There was also a real question as to whether Mostaque himself may have worked on Stable Diffusion while based in the UK, Smith added.

The judge found each of the Getty claims that had been challenged by Stability AI had a real prospect of success and should go to trial.

The judgment comes as pressure mounts on Stability AI’s leadership.

Bloomberg reported last week the company’s leaders had offered the company for sale to potential investors.

According to the same report, Investor fund Coatue also called for Mostaque to resign as CEO over concerns about his leadership and Stability AI’s financial performance.

On November 15, Ed Newton-Rex resigned from his post as vice president of audio at Stability AI, apparently at concerns over its misuse of copyright-protected material.

“To be clear, I’m a supporter of generative AI. It will have many benefits — that’s why I’ve worked on it for 13 years. But I can only support generative AI that doesn’t exploit creators by training models — which may replace them — on their work without permission,” Newton-Rex wrote.

Getty is represented in the UK litigation by Fieldfisher, and Stability AI by Bird & Bird.

Lindsay Lane KC and Jessie Bowhill, instructed by Fieldfisher, appeared for Getty Images. Nicholas Saunders KC and Jaani Riordan, instructed by Bird & Bird, acted for Stability AI.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deals between five more law firms and President Trump and an antitrust lawsuit against Amgen were also among the top talking points this week
US counsel explain how they win new cleantech IP business and how they’re navigating the industry’s challenges
Leaders at the IP firms, which have joined forces with backing from a PE investor, share their vision of building the number one pan-European IP practice
Firms will steer clients towards other ways of getting quicker examinations, but fear the ramifications of the USPTO’s decision
Melissa Haapala added that returning to client advocacy and the chance to work on patent litigation were reasons for returning to private practice
Michelle Clark, who has a generalist litigation background, plans to focus on IP disputes at Alston & Bird
Philips and Vivo have entered into a licensing agreement, putting an end to a five-year-old telecom SEP dispute in India
Stefan Müller discusses managing deadlines, the importance of reflection, and why IP is more than just a 'nice to have'
The three founders of the IP firm’s new US offering say they plan to offer a unique proposition in a market fixated by the billable hour
The opinion provides useful guidance when it comes to how courts might consider contributory infringement, DMCA claims, and other issues in AI copyright cases
Gift this article