No TB drug lawsuits, J&J promises

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

No TB drug lawsuits, J&J promises

Markham, Ontario, Canada - May 21, 2018: Johnson & Johnson Medical Products company in Markham, Ontario, a division of  Johnson & Johnson Inc.

Johnson & Johnson won’t enforce patents for bedaquiline after months of public scrutiny and new licences for generics

Activists have hailed a “sea change” in the treatment of tuberculosis after Johnson & Johnson agreed not to enforce patents covering bedaquiline on Friday, September 29.

J&J said the decision was intended to reassure generics makers that they could market cheaper versions of bedaquiline, a TB drug, in 134 low- and middle-income countries.

In July, the company granted licences for the drug to the UN-backed Stop TB Partnership’s Global Drug Facility.

J&J has faced significant pressure from activists and civil society groups this year over its patent portfolio on bedaquiline.

Bestselling author John Green was among those to lend his voice to a campaign calling on J&J to halt its efforts to secure additional patents on bedaquiline, with the core intellectual property rights set to expire this year.

In March, India’s IP office refused J&J’s application for a secondary patent on bedaquiline after a challenge brought by two TB survivors.

Last month, meanwhile, South Africa’s Competition Commission launched an investigation after it emerged the country wouldn’t benefit from lower prices for the drug worldwide.

Prices for bedaquiline fell sharply after July’s deal with the Global Drug Facility.

J&J now charges most lower-income countries a headline price of $130 for a six-month course of the drug, but South Africa will continue to pay the old figure of $289.

A J&J spokesperson said the company would cooperate fully with the investigation.

Christophe Perrin, TB advocacy pharmacist at Médecins Sans Frontières’s Access Campaign, said the decision announced on Friday, September 29, was “testament to the persistent efforts of TB activists, civil society, and also countries prioritising public health over corporations' interests”.

Perrin called on Japanese drugmaker Otsuka, which owns patents for the drug delamanid, to match J&J’s pledge not to enforce its IP.

Delamanid is often used in combination with bedaquiline to treat multidrug-resistant TB.

“We need all newer TB innovations to be as affordable as absolutely possible, so governments can scale up prevention, testing and treatment to beat back this curable disease that continues to kill 1.6 million people every year.

“People with TB literally cannot afford to wait any longer,” Perrin said.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deals between five more law firms and President Trump and an antitrust lawsuit against Amgen were also among the top talking points this week
US counsel explain how they win new cleantech IP business and how they’re navigating the industry’s challenges
Leaders at the IP firms, which have joined forces with backing from a PE investor, share their vision of building the number one pan-European IP practice
Firms will steer clients towards other ways of getting quicker examinations, but fear the ramifications of the USPTO’s decision
Melissa Haapala added that returning to client advocacy and the chance to work on patent litigation were reasons for returning to private practice
Michelle Clark, who has a generalist litigation background, plans to focus on IP disputes at Alston & Bird
Philips and Vivo have entered into a licensing agreement, putting an end to a five-year-old telecom SEP dispute in India
Stefan Müller discusses managing deadlines, the importance of reflection, and why IP is more than just a 'nice to have'
The three founders of the IP firm’s new US offering say they plan to offer a unique proposition in a market fixated by the billable hour
The opinion provides useful guidance when it comes to how courts might consider contributory infringement, DMCA claims, and other issues in AI copyright cases
Gift this article