UPC refuses preliminary injunction over earlier opt-out

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UPC refuses preliminary injunction over earlier opt-out

Helsinki, Finland
Helsinki

The Helsinki local division rejected AIM Sport’s request for a preliminary injunction in a dispute with rival Supponor

The Unified Patent Court’s Helsinki division rejected a preliminary injunction request from sports advertising specialist AIM in its lawsuit against rival Supponor yesterday, September 21.

A panel made up of Presiding Judge Petri Rinkinen, and Judges Samuel Granata, Mélanie Bessaud, and Eric Augarde handed down the decision after a one-day hearing.

AIM’s PI request failed because it initially opted the asserted patent out of the UPC system before the court opened on June 1.

The sports advertising company later tried to withdraw the opt-out, but the Helsinki court ruled yesterday that it couldn’t because of parallel national proceedings in England and Germany.

Lawyers from Roschier, Powell Gilbert, Rospatt Osten Pross, and Noerr represented AIM in the UPC proceedings, while Hogan Lovells acted for Supponor.

AIM filed the UPC suit in July, as part of a wider dispute in which German and English courts have found Supponor to have infringed valid AIM patents.

Appeals stemming from those decisions are pending.

Yesterday marked the latest in a string of decisions from the new court, which started hearing cases in June.

Earlier this week, the Munich local division granted the first PI to follow a full oral hearing between the parties, in favour of 10x Genomics against NanoString.

On Wednesday, September 13 the Vienna local division refused a PI in a suit between coffeemaker rivals Cup&Cino and Alpina.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The decision marks a rare grant of a request under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act in a patent case
Stobbs has applied to strike out a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
With trademark volumes surging, trademark teams need to think beyond traditional clearance searches, towards a continuous, intelligence-led workflow, says Meghan Medeiros of Corsearch
Brazilian in-house counsel say law firms’ technology investments have not translated into tangible benefits, meaning tech use is a minor factor when selecting advisers
A lack of comfort among some salaried partners shows why law firms must actively foster inclusion, not merely focus on diversity mandates
Arrival of Laura Alonso, alongside a team of 11, will bring ‘significant value’ to ECIJA clients, says CEO
In the first of a two-part article, lawyers at Spruson & Ferguson and Marshall Gerstein provide an overview of China’s system for appealing against patent invalidation decisions
Lawyers and corporate leaders at INTA’s Business of M&A conference in New York discussed how cross-practice collaboration and early in-house involvement can help deals
Lily Li, partner at Morrison Foerster, shares how her litigation team helped secure victory at the ITC in a patent infringement case
Top talking points also included news of an appellate ruling concerning ‘Pisco’ and Indian drugmakers gearing up to launch generic versions of Ozempic as Novo Nordisk’s patent expires
Gift this article