New rules for trademark registration in Cambodia

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

New rules for trademark registration in Cambodia

Sponsored by

tillekegibbins.png
asia-5392799.jpg

Sokmean Chea and Sovannara Khan of Tilleke & Gibbins analyse Cambodia’s new rules for trademark registration, with significant changes to be noted by trademark owners

Cambodia is tightening its trademark procedures by restricting the filing of separate single-class applications for a mark covering multiple classes, and by ending the extension of the deadline for filing affidavits of use or non-use. Disregarding the requirement on affidavits could be especially dangerous for existing registered trademark owners, potentially even resulting in the removal of the registered mark from Cambodia’s trademark registry.

Trademarks covering multiple classes

According to an announcement from Cambodia’s Ministry of Commerce on August 1 2023, the country’s Department of Intellectual Property Rights now only accepts a single application for a trademark covering more than one international class and will not accept multiple single-class applications. In other words, trademarks intended to cover more than one class of goods or services can now only be registered via a single multiple-class application.

Previously, trademark applicants had been allowed to file separate single-class applications for the same mark covering multiple classes. The new rule promises to reduce unnecessary paperwork and simplify the process of trademark registration.

Affidavits of use or non-use

The Ministry of Commerce soon followed its announcement on multiple-class trademark registration by stating in a notification that trademark registrants who miss the deadline for filing an affidavit of use or non-use will no longer be allowed to file an affidavit after the deadline. The ministry had previously been allowing registrants to file after the deadline—such as at the time of filing their trademark renewal—but decided to adopt this stricter approach.

This is in accordance with the Sub-Decree Concerning the Filing of an Affidavit of Use or Non-Use, which requires trademark owners to file an affidavit of use or non-use within one year following the fifth anniversary of the mark’s registration or renewal.

The ministry’s notification also asserts that registered trademarks will be removed from the registry if the affidavit of the mark’s use or non-use is not filed within the required period. This applies to both domestic registrations and international registrations made under the Madrid Protocol.

Although the notification does not explicitly state an effective date, owners of existing trademark registrations should prepare to file any necessary affidavits of use or non-use that are past the legally required time period as soon as possible. Otherwise, they may face removal of their trademark registration from the registry.

Outlook

Cambodia's recent changes to its trademark registration and maintenance procedures mark a significant shift in the country’s IP landscape. The developments described above represent a positive step toward a more mature and standardised regulatory system for trademarks.

Trademark owners and businesses operating in Cambodia should remain proactive in protecting their IP rights by staying updated on regulatory changes and seeking legal counsel when necessary. By doing so, they can navigate the evolving trademark landscape with confidence and safeguard their valuable brand assets in Cambodia’s growing market.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
Gift this article