G20 urges ‘voluntary’ tech transfer amid IP row at WHO

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

G20 urges ‘voluntary’ tech transfer amid IP row at WHO

G20 health.jpg
A meeting of health ministers in Gujarat, India last week | Credit: Govt of India

A statement from health ministers arrived as negotiations over pandemic prevention measures continue at the WHO

G20 health ministers have hailed the importance of tech transfer and knowledge sharing to prevent future pandemics, but only on “voluntary and mutually agreed terms”.

An outcome statement, published after a two-day meeting of health ministers in Gujarat on Saturday, August 18, highlighted the need to improve access to vaccines, diagnostics, and therapies in developing countries.

Negotiations to achieve that aim are ongoing at the World Health Organization (WHO), which is preparing the text of a new pandemic preparedness treaty.

But developed countries have so far resisted lower-income nations’ demands to make rights owners share their intellectual property.

The shadow of that debate is visible in the wording of the G20 statement, says Ellen ‘t Hoen, director at Medicines Law & Policy in Amsterdam.

“This statement does not detract from the rights countries have to use compulsory patent licensing. But the G20 does seem to want to pre-empt the outcome of the pandemic treaty negotiations at the WHO by stressing voluntary measures,” she said.

As Managing IP has previously reported, low-to-middle income countries that want harder commitments on knowledge sharing face an uphill battle at the WHO.

WHO negotiators met in Geneva last month for the latest round of talks on the pandemic treaty, which has several chapters that could affect the global IP system.

The latest text, prepared by the bureau of the WHO’s Intergovernmental Negotiating Body, mostly promotes the voluntary sharing of know-how rather than any hard obligations.

India and South Africa, G20 members that have argued for tech transfer obligations on IP owners in other forums, signed the outcome statement over the weekend.

‘T Hoen said WHO member states should take a “more courageous approach” than shown either by the G20 or in the bureau draft of the pandemic treaty so far.

“‘Voluntary’ is how the world left it the last time around. That did not work out for most countries,” she said.

The outcome statement was agreed unanimously by G20 states, except Russia and China, which objected to a paragraph calling on Russian forces to withdraw from Ukraine.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As global commerce continues to expand through e-commerce platforms and digital marketplaces, protecting brands has become a growing challenge for organisations worldwide. Counterfeiting, intellectual property infringement, and online brand abuse are increasing across industries, making brand protection strategies a critical priority for businesses.
Henrik Holzapfel and Chuck Larsen of McDermott Will & Schulte explain why a Court of Appeal ruling could promote access to justice and present a growth opportunity for litigation finance
A co-partner in charge says the UK prosecution teams are a ‘vital’ part of the firm’s offering, while praising a key injunction win
A team from White & Case has checked in on behalf of Premier Inn Hotels in a UK trademark and passing off case against a cookie brand
Litigation team says pre-trial work and a Section 101 defence helped significantly limit damages payable by ride-sharing firm Lyft in patent case
News of Avanci hiring a senior vice president and the EPO teaming up with a French AI startup were also among the top talking points
Explosm, the independent Texas studio behind the hit webcomic Cyanide & Happiness, partnered with Temu’s IP protection team to combat counterfeiters infringing on its brand
The latest in a dispute over juicing machines, and a shakeup in judicial compositions were also among the top developments
Patent partner Robert Hollingshead explains why the firm remains committed to Japan despite several US firms exiting the Japanese and greater Asia market
Emma Green, partner at Bird & Bird, shares why the Iceland v Iceland dispute could prompt businesses and lawyers to think differently about brand enforcement
Gift this article