Ghana establishes a new IP office to embrace the knowledge-based economy

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Ghana establishes a new IP office to embrace the knowledge-based economy

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
board-4887880.jpg

Megan Dinnie of Spoor & Fisher Jersey reports on the creation of a body designed to adapt to the rapid evolution of IP and harness its potential to drive economic growth

The Ghanaian authorities have published an important bill, the Ghana Industrial Property Office Bill, 2023 (the Bill).

Overview of the Bill

The purpose of the Bill is to establish a new IP office, the Ghana Industrial Property Office (GHIPO).

The GHIPO will administer the use and protection of patents, trademarks, industrial designs, geographical indications and plant varieties in Ghana. Copyright is, however, excluded from the GHIPO’s ambit and is administered by a separate entity, the Copyright Office.

Why create a new IP office?

As the memorandum to the Bill points out, we live in interesting times. Ghana now operates in a “knowledge-based economy”, one in which “innovation will be a key driving force in creating wealth and economic growth for Ghanaians.”

In this brave new world, “the intellectual property system plays a role in facilitating the effective exploitation of innovative knowledge.” This system enhances “Ghana’s climate of innovation to the benefit of the Ghanaian economy and society.” There is a “constant challenge to modernise intellectual property offices as the needs of their clients are evolving rapidly.”

The Bill in more detail

The Bill deals with issues that are administrative in nature. Here is a very brief summary of the provisions:

  • IP office – the Bill establishes the GHIPO as a body corporate.

  • Board – the Bill creates a governing body, the Board, with representatives from various ministries. The Board can establish committees and it must meet at least every three months.

  • A director-general – the GHIPO will be led by a director-general with at least 15 years’ experience in IP. Other staff can be appointed as required.

  • Finances – the GHIPO’s finances will be managed as per the Public Financial Management Act, 2016. The GHIPO must keep proper books and records.

  • Regulations – there is provision for regulations governing IP rights.

  • Rights, assets and liabilities – the rights, assets and liabilities of the present Registrar General’s Department relating to industrial property will be transferred to the GHIPO.

  • Employees – employees of the present Industrial Property Section of the Registrar-General’s Department will be transferred to the GHIPO.

A positive development

The changes brought about by the Bill flow from a very clear recognition that the world in which IP operates is changing rapidly. That recognition is welcome.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
Gift this article