Ghana establishes a new IP office to embrace the knowledge-based economy

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ghana establishes a new IP office to embrace the knowledge-based economy

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
board-4887880.jpg

Megan Dinnie of Spoor & Fisher Jersey reports on the creation of a body designed to adapt to the rapid evolution of IP and harness its potential to drive economic growth

The Ghanaian authorities have published an important bill, the Ghana Industrial Property Office Bill, 2023 (the Bill).

Overview of the Bill

The purpose of the Bill is to establish a new IP office, the Ghana Industrial Property Office (GHIPO).

The GHIPO will administer the use and protection of patents, trademarks, industrial designs, geographical indications and plant varieties in Ghana. Copyright is, however, excluded from the GHIPO’s ambit and is administered by a separate entity, the Copyright Office.

Why create a new IP office?

As the memorandum to the Bill points out, we live in interesting times. Ghana now operates in a “knowledge-based economy”, one in which “innovation will be a key driving force in creating wealth and economic growth for Ghanaians.”

In this brave new world, “the intellectual property system plays a role in facilitating the effective exploitation of innovative knowledge.” This system enhances “Ghana’s climate of innovation to the benefit of the Ghanaian economy and society.” There is a “constant challenge to modernise intellectual property offices as the needs of their clients are evolving rapidly.”

The Bill in more detail

The Bill deals with issues that are administrative in nature. Here is a very brief summary of the provisions:

  • IP office – the Bill establishes the GHIPO as a body corporate.

  • Board – the Bill creates a governing body, the Board, with representatives from various ministries. The Board can establish committees and it must meet at least every three months.

  • A director-general – the GHIPO will be led by a director-general with at least 15 years’ experience in IP. Other staff can be appointed as required.

  • Finances – the GHIPO’s finances will be managed as per the Public Financial Management Act, 2016. The GHIPO must keep proper books and records.

  • Regulations – there is provision for regulations governing IP rights.

  • Rights, assets and liabilities – the rights, assets and liabilities of the present Registrar General’s Department relating to industrial property will be transferred to the GHIPO.

  • Employees – employees of the present Industrial Property Section of the Registrar-General’s Department will be transferred to the GHIPO.

A positive development

The changes brought about by the Bill flow from a very clear recognition that the world in which IP operates is changing rapidly. That recognition is welcome.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Essenese Obhan shares his expansion plans and vision of creating a ‘one-stop shop’ for clients after Indian firms Obhan & Associates and Mason & Associates joined forces
From AI and the UPC to troublesome trademarks in China, experts name the IP trends likely to dominate 2026
Colm Murphy says he is keen to help clients navigate cross-border IP challenges in Europe
With 2025 behind us, US practitioners sit down with Managing IP to discuss the major IP moments from the year and what to expect in 2026
Large-scale transatlantic mergers will give US entities a strong foothold at the UPC, and could spark further fragmentation of European patent practices
This year’s most-read stories covered uncertainty at the USPTO, a potential boycott of a major international IP conference, rankings releases, and a contempt of court proceeding
The parties have agreed on a court-guided settlement covering Pantech’s entire SEP portfolio, marking a global first
The introduction of Canada’s patent term adjustment has left practitioners sceptical about its value, with high fees and limited eligibility meaning SMEs could lose out
With the US privacy landscape more fragmented and active than ever and federal legislation stalled, lawyers at Sheppard Mullin explain how states are taking bold steps to define their own regimes
Viji Krishnan of Corsearch unpicks the results of a survey that reveals almost 80% of trademark practitioners believe in a hybrid AI model for trademark clearance and searches
Gift this article