Ghana establishes a new IP office to embrace the knowledge-based economy

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ghana establishes a new IP office to embrace the knowledge-based economy

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
board-4887880.jpg

Megan Dinnie of Spoor & Fisher Jersey reports on the creation of a body designed to adapt to the rapid evolution of IP and harness its potential to drive economic growth

The Ghanaian authorities have published an important bill, the Ghana Industrial Property Office Bill, 2023 (the Bill).

Overview of the Bill

The purpose of the Bill is to establish a new IP office, the Ghana Industrial Property Office (GHIPO).

The GHIPO will administer the use and protection of patents, trademarks, industrial designs, geographical indications and plant varieties in Ghana. Copyright is, however, excluded from the GHIPO’s ambit and is administered by a separate entity, the Copyright Office.

Why create a new IP office?

As the memorandum to the Bill points out, we live in interesting times. Ghana now operates in a “knowledge-based economy”, one in which “innovation will be a key driving force in creating wealth and economic growth for Ghanaians.”

In this brave new world, “the intellectual property system plays a role in facilitating the effective exploitation of innovative knowledge.” This system enhances “Ghana’s climate of innovation to the benefit of the Ghanaian economy and society.” There is a “constant challenge to modernise intellectual property offices as the needs of their clients are evolving rapidly.”

The Bill in more detail

The Bill deals with issues that are administrative in nature. Here is a very brief summary of the provisions:

  • IP office – the Bill establishes the GHIPO as a body corporate.

  • Board – the Bill creates a governing body, the Board, with representatives from various ministries. The Board can establish committees and it must meet at least every three months.

  • A director-general – the GHIPO will be led by a director-general with at least 15 years’ experience in IP. Other staff can be appointed as required.

  • Finances – the GHIPO’s finances will be managed as per the Public Financial Management Act, 2016. The GHIPO must keep proper books and records.

  • Regulations – there is provision for regulations governing IP rights.

  • Rights, assets and liabilities – the rights, assets and liabilities of the present Registrar General’s Department relating to industrial property will be transferred to the GHIPO.

  • Employees – employees of the present Industrial Property Section of the Registrar-General’s Department will be transferred to the GHIPO.

A positive development

The changes brought about by the Bill flow from a very clear recognition that the world in which IP operates is changing rapidly. That recognition is welcome.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Apple’s lawsuit against OpenAI, which features Tier 1-ranked disputes firms on both sides, reflects how trade secrets litigation is becoming a prominent competition feature
Drew & Napier’s leadership appointments show one way full-service firms can back up claims about the strategic importance of IP
Strike-out application will hear claims that the copyright aspect of an IP infringement claim brought by a gambling and sports betting group should be dropped
Amongst a sea of mergers, Lathrop GPM and HG Law have set out plans to combine, positioning themselves to compete with both IP boutiques and full-service firms
Patrícia Paias explains why she loves the science and business behind an idea and why potential rights owners must avoid the ‘file and forget’ philosophy
Lawyers eagerly await news of what IP specialist Sir Colin Birss will bring to one of the England and Wales judiciary’s most important roles
María Aurora García of Berken IP explains how intellectual property rights holders can use customs monitoring and online enforcement tools to identify parallel imports and support compliance with consumer protection rules
The Jakarta-based firm says personal networks and a distinctive strategy can help it guide foreign clients through what can be a tricky IP landscape
Munich litigation boutique formed by former Taylor Wessing partners continues expansion as it seeks to cement its position in the UPC market
Yvonne Tang and Siau Wen Lim, the second and third IP specialists to sit on the firm’s management committee, say IP is ‘uniquely positioned’ to support cross-practice work
Gift this article