Highly logical: Turkish IP Office's Vulcan salute ruling sets final frontier for copyright ownership argument

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Highly logical: Turkish IP Office's Vulcan salute ruling sets final frontier for copyright ownership argument

Sponsored by

gunpartners-400px.png
graffiti-1015952.jpg

Güldeniz Doğan Alkan and Ayşenur Çıtak Bozdağ of Gün + Partners explain the significance of a decision regarding a popular Star Trek hand gesture in response to an opposition filed by CBS

According to Article 6/6 of the Turkish Industrial Property Code, “An application for registration of a trademark shall be refused upon the opposition of the right holder if it consists of a person’s name, trade name, photography, copyright or any other intellectual property right of another.” Based on this provision, it is possible to oppose an application relying upon the opponent’s other intellectual property rights ownership.

On December 20 2022, the Re-Examination and Evaluation Board (the Higher Board) of the Turkish Patent and Trademark Office (the IP Office) rendered a decision including detailed explanations regarding the copyright ownership argument and set an excellent example of the IP Office’s criteria for accepting such an argument. Before discussing the decision, it should be noted that the Higher Board consists of three senior examiners and generally conducts a comprehensive and consistent examination. So, the Higher Board’s decisions are valuable as precedents in opposition proceedings.

The application and CBS opposition

An application was filed for the following for the services in class 35 by a real person.

Gesture.jpg

As illustrated, the application consists of a hand gesture known as the ‘Vulcan salute’, which was used in the Star Trek series by the character Mr. Spock and become famous throughout the world.

An opposition was filed against the application by CBS Studios Inc. (CBS), the owner of certain rights regarding the television series Star Trek and all the related rights. CBS’ rights include numerous copyrights, trademarks, and merchandising and other subsidiary rights relating to the series and 13 motion pictures, including logos, ships, characters’ names, fictional species, phrases, uniforms, props, and other elements appearing therein (Star Trek Properties). The opposition was based on CBS’s genuine right ownership over Star Trek Properties, CBS’s copyright over Star Trek Properties, the well-known status of Star Trek Properties, and the applicant’s bad faith.

The Turkish IP Office’s decision

The Trademark Department of the IP Office rejected the opposition entirely. Upon CBS’s appeal, the matter was reviewed by the Higher Board. In its decision, the Higher Board mentioned the facts below, which were included in CBS’s petitions and evidence:

  • Star Trek was first broadcast in 1966;

  • There are numerous books, comic books, magazines, and collectibles dedicated to Star Trek;

  • Mr. Spock is the iconic character of Star Trek, who makes the authentic hand gesture known as the Vulcan salute;

  • The Vulcan salute gesture has been made in reference to Star Trek by Barack Obama, NASA, Hollywood stars, and Turkish celebrities;

  • The Star Trek series have been broadcast in Turkey since the 1970s, on several channels;

  • The series were presented as comics in the most highly circulated newspapers;

  • The series are still followed by Turkish audiences; and

  • CBS is the holder of the intellectual property rights emerging from the trademarks related to Star Trek.

Within this context, the Higher Board stated that the application includes the iconic figurative device of the Vulcan salute, associated with the famous Star Trek series, and directly evokes or references the relevant series, and accepted CBS’s appeal based on Article 6/6 of the Turkish Industrial Property Code (CBS’s copyrights over Star Trek properties). The decision was finalised upon no further appeal by the applicant.

The importance of the ruling

Based on the decision, a copyright ownership argument is supported by providing the history, showing extensive use nationally and internationally, and underlining the popularity of the artistic work.

Precedents regarding implementation of this article by the office are limited since it is considered as a supporting argument and generally alleged with bad faith and genuine right ownership. Therefore, the Higher Board’s decision sets an important example, since it accepted the opposition based solely on copyright ownership. Also, it provides the criteria that the office considers while assessing a copyright ownership argument.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deals between five more law firms and President Trump and an antitrust lawsuit against Amgen were also among the top talking points this week
US counsel explain how they win new cleantech IP business and how they’re navigating the industry’s challenges
Leaders at the IP firms, which have joined forces with backing from a PE investor, share their vision of building the number one pan-European IP practice
Firms will steer clients towards other ways of getting quicker examinations, but fear the ramifications of the USPTO’s decision
Melissa Haapala added that returning to client advocacy and the chance to work on patent litigation were reasons for returning to private practice
Michelle Clark, who has a generalist litigation background, plans to focus on IP disputes at Alston & Bird
Philips and Vivo have entered into a licensing agreement, putting an end to a five-year-old telecom SEP dispute in India
Stefan Müller discusses managing deadlines, the importance of reflection, and why IP is more than just a 'nice to have'
The three founders of the IP firm’s new US offering say they plan to offer a unique proposition in a market fixated by the billable hour
The opinion provides useful guidance when it comes to how courts might consider contributory infringement, DMCA claims, and other issues in AI copyright cases
Gift this article