Breaking: UPC chief urges EU to rethink SEP plan

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Breaking: UPC chief urges EU to rethink SEP plan

KerstinJorna.jpg
Kerstin Jorna, head of DG Grow, speaking at the UPC inauguration in Luxembourg today

Klaus Grabinski told delegates at a UPC inauguration event that the proposed SEP regulation would limit access to justice

The most senior judge of the Unified Patent Court has sharply criticised the European Commission’s draft standard-essential patent reforms.

Klaus Grabinski, chief judge of the UPC Court of Appeal, said he feared the draft SEP regulation, published last month, was not currently compliant with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Speaking at the formal inauguration of the UPC at the Hémicycle in Luxembourg today, May 30 – which Managing IP is attending – Grabinski said he felt obliged to comment on the plan.

The German judge said he was concerned that SEP owners would have to register their patents at the EUIPO before they could bring an infringement action at the UPC.

“I fully support the commission’s aim to enhance transparency, but access to justice is a core fundamental right,” he said.

Grabinski questioned why SEP owners should not be able to bring infringement actions in the EU while they could in the UK and China.

Under the commission’s draft regulation, patent owners would have to register their SEPs at the EUIPO, which would carry out essentiality checks and determine fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) royalties.

They would be unable to bring infringement actions for those patents until the end of that process, which could take up to nine months.

But SEP owners would still be able to seek “provisional injunctions of a financial nature” while the EUIPO process was ongoing.

SEP owners had seen the UPC as an attractive option, mainly thanks to the prospect of Europe-wide injunctions.

But it’s unclear what role the new court will play in the future of global SEP litigation if the commission’s plan is realised.

“I have no doubt that the regulation will be fully compliant with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights after it has gone through the [full] legislative process,” Grabinski added.

Kerstin Jorna, head of DG Grow – the EU body that drew up the proposal – also gave a speech but did not comment on Grabinski’s remarks.

Jorna spoke instead about the importance of intellectual property to the EU single market and encouraged all member states to join the unitary patent system.

The UPC will open on Thursday, June 1.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article