Breaking: UPC chief urges EU to rethink SEP plan

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Breaking: UPC chief urges EU to rethink SEP plan

KerstinJorna.jpg
Kerstin Jorna, head of DG Grow, speaking at the UPC inauguration in Luxembourg today

Klaus Grabinski told delegates at a UPC inauguration event that the proposed SEP regulation would limit access to justice

The most senior judge of the Unified Patent Court has sharply criticised the European Commission’s draft standard-essential patent reforms.

Klaus Grabinski, chief judge of the UPC Court of Appeal, said he feared the draft SEP regulation, published last month, was not currently compliant with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Speaking at the formal inauguration of the UPC at the Hémicycle in Luxembourg today, May 30 – which Managing IP is attending – Grabinski said he felt obliged to comment on the plan.

The German judge said he was concerned that SEP owners would have to register their patents at the EUIPO before they could bring an infringement action at the UPC.

“I fully support the commission’s aim to enhance transparency, but access to justice is a core fundamental right,” he said.

Grabinski questioned why SEP owners should not be able to bring infringement actions in the EU while they could in the UK and China.

Under the commission’s draft regulation, patent owners would have to register their SEPs at the EUIPO, which would carry out essentiality checks and determine fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) royalties.

They would be unable to bring infringement actions for those patents until the end of that process, which could take up to nine months.

But SEP owners would still be able to seek “provisional injunctions of a financial nature” while the EUIPO process was ongoing.

SEP owners had seen the UPC as an attractive option, mainly thanks to the prospect of Europe-wide injunctions.

But it’s unclear what role the new court will play in the future of global SEP litigation if the commission’s plan is realised.

“I have no doubt that the regulation will be fully compliant with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights after it has gone through the [full] legislative process,” Grabinski added.

Kerstin Jorna, head of DG Grow – the EU body that drew up the proposal – also gave a speech but did not comment on Grabinski’s remarks.

Jorna spoke instead about the importance of intellectual property to the EU single market and encouraged all member states to join the unitary patent system.

The UPC will open on Thursday, June 1.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The Bardehle Pagenberg attorneys-at-law discuss the firm’s Managing IP EMEA Awards 2026 success, Unified Patent Court litigation strategy, and evolving European patent trends
A patent battle between two legal tech companies and a loss for Elon Musk’s xAI against OpenAI were also among the top talking points
With drug prices a hot topic in the US, courts are seemingly more reluctant to prevent the entry of generics to the market
Academic Eden Sarid joins us during Pride Month to discuss queer expression and IP law, Patagonia v Pattie Gonia, and how queer and AI-generated creations both pose novelty concerns
Patent attorney Michael Henson joins the firm to lead its freshly launched blockchain and digital assets practice
A dispute over mammogram technology, and a development in the case between GSK and Moderna were also among the top talking points in recent weeks
With rankings for Western Europe set to be published on June 25, we sat down with our research lead to find out what practitioners and law firms can expect
Peter O’Sullivan, a professional services executive, says he is looking forward to helping Pearce IP become the leading life sciences firm in Australia and New Zealand
Matteo Di Lernia, advocate at LCA Studio Legale, unpicks the CJEU’s ruling in M.M. Ristorazione v Villa Ramazzini, including its impact on litigation strategies
Leaders at IP boutique say the decision to pursue sponsorless partnership with the specialised investment arm of a private equity firm comes at a time of ‘profound transformation’ in the profession
Gift this article