Med-El loses UK appeal in Advanced Bionics fight

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Med-El loses UK appeal in Advanced Bionics fight

Entrance to the Royal Court of Justice

The Court of Appeal had stern words for Med-El’s representatives after they highlighted a deputy judge’s background as a solicitor

Hearing implant maker Med-El lost an appeal in its patent fight with Advanced Bionics at the England and Wales Court of Appeal today, May 24.

Lady Justice Kathryn Thirlwall, who handed down the judgment, also had sharp words for Med-El’s representatives over a reference to a deputy High Court judge’s background as a solicitor.

Med-El had challenged the High Court’s decision, issued by Mr Justice Campbell Forsyth in June 2022, to invalidate one of its patents covering cochlear implants.

Arguments began yesterday, May 23, and finished this morning.

The court, which dismissed Med-El’s appeal in full, handed down its verdict this afternoon.

Thirlwall heard the appeal alongside Lord Justices Richard Arnold and Colin Birss.

The full judgment has yet to be published, but Managing IP attended a virtual hand down.

According to Med-El’s counsel, Forsyth made an error in finding the patent obvious over a piece of prior art.

The prior art in question was another patent covering the design of cochlear implants and referred to as ‘Zimmerling’.

Sharp rebuke

At the end of proceedings, Thirlwall criticised Med-El’s representatives over how they referred to Forsyth in their skeleton argument.

The document referred to Forsyth’s job as a partner at Mishcon de Reya and noted that he was appointed to sit as a deputy High Court judge in late 2021.

Thirlwall said these details were irrelevant and “raised eyebrows” among the judges.

“Those matters shouldn’t have been in the skeleton argument.

“It’s no more appealing to do that than to say it was a very strong court,” she told Adrian Speck KC, who argued for Med-El.

Speck said the brief was only meant to identify the judge.

But Thirlwall replied: “His name would have done, and we had that on the judgment.

“I wouldn’t expect to see that sort of observation made in anyone’s skeletons before this court.”

In its own skeleton, Advanced Bionics criticised Med-El for highlighting Forsyth’s training as a solicitor.

“They could also have pointed out that he is a patent specialist of many years’ standing,” the Advanced Bionics brief said.

Solicitor judges are rare in England and Wales, where most High Court judges are former barristers.

An EPO board of appeal upheld an amended version of Med-El’s patent last September.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deals between five more law firms and President Trump and an antitrust lawsuit against Amgen were also among the top talking points this week
US counsel explain how they win new cleantech IP business and how they’re navigating the industry’s challenges
Leaders at the IP firms, which have joined forces with backing from a PE investor, share their vision of building the number one pan-European IP practice
Firms will steer clients towards other ways of getting quicker examinations, but fear the ramifications of the USPTO’s decision
Melissa Haapala added that returning to client advocacy and the chance to work on patent litigation were reasons for returning to private practice
Michelle Clark, who has a generalist litigation background, plans to focus on IP disputes at Alston & Bird
Philips and Vivo have entered into a licensing agreement, putting an end to a five-year-old telecom SEP dispute in India
Stefan Müller discusses managing deadlines, the importance of reflection, and why IP is more than just a 'nice to have'
The three founders of the IP firm’s new US offering say they plan to offer a unique proposition in a market fixated by the billable hour
The opinion provides useful guidance when it comes to how courts might consider contributory infringement, DMCA claims, and other issues in AI copyright cases
Gift this article