China: Measures for the standard contract for outbound transfer of personal information – part one

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: Measures for the standard contract for outbound transfer of personal information – part one

Sponsored by

Tahota logo.JPG
social-media-1635577 (1).jpg

In the first of a two-part series, Charles Feng, Lian Xue and Yifan Lu of Tahota outline the key features of China’s new measures for the cross-border sharing of personal information

On February 24 2023, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) published the Measures for the Standard Contract for Outbound Transfer of Personal Information (the Measures). It also published its annexes of Standard Contract for Outbound Transfer of Personal Information (Standard Contract), which will be implemented from June 1 2023. The Measures were issued after the issuance of the Security Assessment Measures for Outbound Data Transfers in September 2022. The Measures, along with a security assessment and personal information protection certification, will be one of the three major approaches for the outbound transfer of personal information.

In comparison to the other two routes, the Standard Contract for personal information is widely regarded as having certain advantages. These include lower costs and an easier operation, with high reference and application value for enterprises with cross-border personal information transfers. In conjunction with the new Measures and the Standard Contract, there are the following key points that enterprises need to focus on in their compliance work for cross-border personal information transfer.

Salient features of the Standard Contract

Strict format contract

In comparison to previous drafts of the Measures and Standard Contract for public comments, the official version of the Standard Contract further restricted the autonomy of will. The domestic personal information processor and the overseas recipient must sign and perform in strict accordance with the terms provided by the CAC. In addition, only the CAC is authorised to amend and modify the Standard Contract. The Standard Contract of the Measures is complete and specific, covering various aspects including:

  • Basic information;

  • Obligations of personal information processors and overseas recipients;

  • Rights and obligations of subjects of personal information;

  • The relationship between laws and regulations of the receiving place and the performance of the Standard Contract; and

  • Remedies and liabilities for breach of contract.

In addition, the Measures clearly stipulate that enterprises must not make additional agreements or any other forms of documents that conflict with the terms of the Standard Contract.

Recordation of the Standard Contract

According to the Measures, personal information processors are required to file a recordal of the Standard Contract with their local cyberspace administration within 10 working days from the effective date of the Standard Contract. Compared to the security assessment, the application of the Standard Contract is ampler in terms of preparation time and simpler in terms of administrative procedures. For enterprises that meet the requirements of the Standard Contract, such a path is undoubtedly more convenient and flexible, which is an advantage.

Protection of rights of the owner of personal information

The Standard Contract embodies the rights and obligations of three parties, namely: the domestic personal information processor, the overseas recipient and the owner of personal information. The establishment of the Standard Contract between the domestic personal information processor and the overseas recipient as the contracting parties will have a direct impact on the rights of the owner of personal information. The Standard Contract provides the owner of personal information as:

  • A beneficiary, and

  • Authorised to sue the personal information processor and the overseas recipient directly.

The Standard Contract also facilitates litigation and remedies for the owner of personal information through joint and several liability clauses if infringement occurs.

Tahota would like to thank Jing-mei Luo for their contribution to the article.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The court, which has handed down one of the highest ever IP damages awards in India, held Amazon liable for infringing the 'Beverly Hills Polo Club' trademark
In BSH v Electrolux, the CJEU said that courts can rule on patent infringement in other member states even where validity is raised as a defence
Exclusive data and analysis reveal the interplay between costs transparency and other factors in helping South African counsel pick their external advisers
A settlement between SharkNinja and Dyson, a costs dispute involving a pornography company, and people moves at Clifford Chance and Casalonga were among the top talking points
The treatment of USPTO employees has been haphazard and shows a misunderstanding of how the IP office works and the challenges it faces
Jeff Kuester discusses why IP is the perfect party conversation and why excitement and stress are two of a kind
IP counsel Anna Bien and global marketing manager Lesia Tarasenko explain how the brewery secured an EUTM and the lessons they learned
Federal employees, including at the USPTO, have been ordered to justify their roles by outlining what they accomplished in the last week
Philips wins more than $2m in damages as Delhi High Court comes down hard on Indian DVD makers for wasting the court’s time
Public documents in a long-running feud between Brainchild and CPA Global provide more information about how CPA manages patent renewal costs
Gift this article