Safety first: senators introduce bill to protect standards copyright

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Safety first: senators introduce bill to protect standards copyright

US capitol map washington dc

Safety standards wouldn’t lose copyright protection when named in law, so long as they were accessible for free online

Senators introduced legislation yesterday, March 16, to ensure that safety standards do not lose copyright protection if they get incorporated into a law that references their name – so long as the standards remain freely available online.

The Protecting and Enhancing Public Access to Codes (Pro Codes) Act of 2023 was introduced by Democratic senators Chris Coons and Sheldon Whitehouse and Republican senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis.

According to a summary of the bill, non-profit standards development organisations, which create standards on safety matters such as fire safety or building codes, sell copies of their work to professionals to finance their activities.

Governments often incorporate these standards into laws that reference them by name.

But according to the bill’s summary, those standards are at risk of losing copyright protection when they become law.

Dain Hansen, executive vice president for government relations at the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials Group in Washington DC, said in a statement that his organisation has helped create rigorous codes and standards.

“With a growing list of challenges threatening the resiliency of our water systems, it is essential that the intellectual property of these codes and standards remain protected so that our communities can continue to benefit from the safety, innovation, and [efficiencies] embedded within,” he said.

Tillis said in a statement that standards should continue to be eligible for copyright protection.

“I believe the Pro Codes Act strikes the right balance to ensure those developing safety standards are able to afford to do their crucial work, while providing the public with free digital access to these standards,” he said.

The introduction of this bill comes amid a battle between non-profit organisation Public.Resource.Org, which focuses on sharing public-domain materials, and various non-profit standards development organisations.

Public Resource was sued for copyright infringement after it had distributed safety standards online that had already been incorporated into law.

The District Court of the District of Columbia ruled against Public Resource in 2017. But, in 2018, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia reversed the decision and remanded it back to the district court under the fair use doctrine.

The district court then ruled that Public Resource could reproduce 184 standards in their entirety and partly reproduce one. However, the court prevented the publication of other 32 standards.

The plaintiffs, which include American Society for Testing and Materials, National Fire Protection Association and the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, have appealed the case back to the Court of Appeals.

Meanwhile, the Pro Codes Act has been referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, which will have to release the bill if it’s going to advance to the full Senate.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deals between five more law firms and President Trump and an antitrust lawsuit against Amgen were also among the top talking points this week
US counsel explain how they win new cleantech IP business and how they’re navigating the industry’s challenges
Leaders at the IP firms, which have joined forces with backing from a PE investor, share their vision of building the number one pan-European IP practice
Firms will steer clients towards other ways of getting quicker examinations, but fear the ramifications of the USPTO’s decision
Melissa Haapala added that returning to client advocacy and the chance to work on patent litigation were reasons for returning to private practice
Michelle Clark, who has a generalist litigation background, plans to focus on IP disputes at Alston & Bird
Philips and Vivo have entered into a licensing agreement, putting an end to a five-year-old telecom SEP dispute in India
Stefan Müller discusses managing deadlines, the importance of reflection, and why IP is more than just a 'nice to have'
The three founders of the IP firm’s new US offering say they plan to offer a unique proposition in a market fixated by the billable hour
The opinion provides useful guidance when it comes to how courts might consider contributory infringement, DMCA claims, and other issues in AI copyright cases
Gift this article