Safety first: senators introduce bill to protect standards copyright

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Safety first: senators introduce bill to protect standards copyright

US capitol map washington dc

Safety standards wouldn’t lose copyright protection when named in law, so long as they were accessible for free online

Senators introduced legislation yesterday, March 16, to ensure that safety standards do not lose copyright protection if they get incorporated into a law that references their name – so long as the standards remain freely available online.

The Protecting and Enhancing Public Access to Codes (Pro Codes) Act of 2023 was introduced by Democratic senators Chris Coons and Sheldon Whitehouse and Republican senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis.

According to a summary of the bill, non-profit standards development organisations, which create standards on safety matters such as fire safety or building codes, sell copies of their work to professionals to finance their activities.

Governments often incorporate these standards into laws that reference them by name.

But according to the bill’s summary, those standards are at risk of losing copyright protection when they become law.

Dain Hansen, executive vice president for government relations at the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials Group in Washington DC, said in a statement that his organisation has helped create rigorous codes and standards.

“With a growing list of challenges threatening the resiliency of our water systems, it is essential that the intellectual property of these codes and standards remain protected so that our communities can continue to benefit from the safety, innovation, and [efficiencies] embedded within,” he said.

Tillis said in a statement that standards should continue to be eligible for copyright protection.

“I believe the Pro Codes Act strikes the right balance to ensure those developing safety standards are able to afford to do their crucial work, while providing the public with free digital access to these standards,” he said.

The introduction of this bill comes amid a battle between non-profit organisation Public.Resource.Org, which focuses on sharing public-domain materials, and various non-profit standards development organisations.

Public Resource was sued for copyright infringement after it had distributed safety standards online that had already been incorporated into law.

The District Court of the District of Columbia ruled against Public Resource in 2017. But, in 2018, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia reversed the decision and remanded it back to the district court under the fair use doctrine.

The district court then ruled that Public Resource could reproduce 184 standards in their entirety and partly reproduce one. However, the court prevented the publication of other 32 standards.

The plaintiffs, which include American Society for Testing and Materials, National Fire Protection Association and the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, have appealed the case back to the Court of Appeals.

Meanwhile, the Pro Codes Act has been referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, which will have to release the bill if it’s going to advance to the full Senate.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article