Lenovo to pay InterDigital $138.7m for FRAND royalty

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Lenovo to pay InterDigital $138.7m for FRAND royalty

Rolls 2k-comp.jpg

The England and Wales High Court handed down one of the most hotly anticipated FRAND rulings for some time

The England and Wales High Court ruled today, March 16, that Lenovo must pay InterDigital $138.7 million for a global licence to its 3G, 4G and 5G standard-essential patents.

The ruling, by Mr James Mellor, was the most hotly anticipated fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) judgment in the UK since the Supreme Court’s decision in Huawei v Unwired Planet in 2020.

Today’s ruling confirms the Supreme Court’s approach in that case, in which it said courts in England and Wales are able to set a global FRAND rate when the licensor and licensee cannot agree on terms.

In today’s judgment, Mellor found that neither InterDigital's 5G extended offer nor Lenovo's lump sum offer were FRAND or within the acceptable range.

The final amount of $138.7 million is around 40% lower than what InterDigital had originally sought. Lenovo made a pre-trial offer of around $80 million but InterDigital’s proposal amounted to more than $337 million.

Mark Marfé, partner at Pinsent Masons in London, said it was predictable that neither offer was FRAND as both were so far apart.

“These cases are very time-consuming and expensive, and it is likely the parties would have sought to agree a rate among themselves to avoid the need for litigation if their offers had not been so far apart,” he said.

Josh Schmidt, chief legal officer at InterDigital, said: “We welcome the court’s decision as the first major SEP FRAND judgment that recognises that a licensee should pay in full for the past infringement of SEPs, and we agree with the court that this could be a powerful way of guarding against patent holdout in the future.”

He added that InterDigital plans to appeal against the decision, as certain aspects of it did not accurately reflect the company's licensing programme.

John Mulgrew, Lenovo’s vice president, deputy general counsel and chief IP officer, said the company saw the ruling as a “major win for the technology industry and the customers we serve”.

“It underscores both the importance of FRAND terms for patent licensing and the requirement of transparency by patent holders engaged in licensing practices.

“The court has confirmed that Lenovo is, and always has been, a willing licensee – even in the face of InterDigital’s supra-FRAND offers and behaviour as an unwilling licensor,” he added.

InterDigital had previously secured a series of wins in technical trials, but the FRAND case was heard separately.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The new outfit, Ashurst Perkins Coie, will bring together around 3,000 lawyers across 23 countries
In the seventh episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Out, a network for LGBTQAI+ professionals and their allies
Sara Horton, co-chair of Willkie’s IP litigation group, reflects on launching the firm’s Chicago office during a global pandemic, and how she advises young, female attorneys
Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
Gift this article