Mitsubishi Tanabe lands '$940m' revenue boost after Novartis win

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mitsubishi Tanabe lands '$940m' revenue boost after Novartis win

NovartisCOVER.jpg
Credit: Taljat / Adobe Stock

Paul Hastings led Mitsubishi Tanabe to victory over Novartis at the International Chamber of Commerce

Japanese pharma company Mitsubishi Tanabe has secured an arbitration victory against Novartis at the International Chamber of Commerce, a case related to blockbuster multiple sclerosis drug Gilenya (fingolimod).

According to Mitsubishi Tanabe, a subsidiary of Mitsubishi Chemical Group, the award will see its revenue increase by around $940 million.

The tribunal, which issued the decision on Monday, February 13, denied Novartis’s claims that provisions of a licence controlling royalties that it had to pay to Mitsubishi Tanabe in the US, EU and other jurisdictions were invalid.

Although Mitsubishi had received royalties from Novartis’s Gilenya, which used the Japanese company's patent rights and know-how, it hadn’t recognised those royalties as revenue. This was due to International Financial Reporting Standards 15, which sets out how to report information about revenue and cash flows from contracts with customers.

However, as a result of the ICC's decision, Mitsubishi can now recognise these royalties as revenue.

In a filing with Japan’s Financial Accounting Standards Foundation on Thursday, February 16, Mitsubishi said it was revising its revenue forecast for this quarter by ¥126 billion ($938.4 million) in light of the arbitration win.

The filing said: “The royalties which have not been recognised as revenue … during the arbitration proceedings will all be recognised as revenue in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending March 31 2023.”

Mitsubishi also received ¥3 billion in arbitration-related costs from Novartis.

The Swiss pharma company had filed an application for an arbitration against Mitsubishi Tanabe in 2019.

Paul Hastings advised Mitsubishi Tanabe.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article