Mitsubishi Tanabe lands '$940m' revenue boost after Novartis win

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mitsubishi Tanabe lands '$940m' revenue boost after Novartis win

NovartisCOVER.jpg
Credit: Taljat / Adobe Stock

Paul Hastings led Mitsubishi Tanabe to victory over Novartis at the International Chamber of Commerce

Japanese pharma company Mitsubishi Tanabe has secured an arbitration victory against Novartis at the International Chamber of Commerce, a case related to blockbuster multiple sclerosis drug Gilenya (fingolimod).

According to Mitsubishi Tanabe, a subsidiary of Mitsubishi Chemical Group, the award will see its revenue increase by around $940 million.

The tribunal, which issued the decision on Monday, February 13, denied Novartis’s claims that provisions of a licence controlling royalties that it had to pay to Mitsubishi Tanabe in the US, EU and other jurisdictions were invalid.

Although Mitsubishi had received royalties from Novartis’s Gilenya, which used the Japanese company's patent rights and know-how, it hadn’t recognised those royalties as revenue. This was due to International Financial Reporting Standards 15, which sets out how to report information about revenue and cash flows from contracts with customers.

However, as a result of the ICC's decision, Mitsubishi can now recognise these royalties as revenue.

In a filing with Japan’s Financial Accounting Standards Foundation on Thursday, February 16, Mitsubishi said it was revising its revenue forecast for this quarter by ¥126 billion ($938.4 million) in light of the arbitration win.

The filing said: “The royalties which have not been recognised as revenue … during the arbitration proceedings will all be recognised as revenue in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending March 31 2023.”

Mitsubishi also received ¥3 billion in arbitration-related costs from Novartis.

The Swiss pharma company had filed an application for an arbitration against Mitsubishi Tanabe in 2019.

Paul Hastings advised Mitsubishi Tanabe.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Ranjna Mehta-Dutt, who moved to Chadha & Chadha after 25 years at Remfry & Sagar, says the firm plans to expand its life sciences practice through targeted recruitment and dedicated teams for bigger clients
The initial contempt of court claim targeted Stobbs and the firm’s client for allegedly interfering with the administration of justice
Acquisition of platform developed by Boehmert & Boehmert lawyer set to create a combined platform for patent drafting and prosecution in Europe
Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
Gift this article