Keeping up with amendments to trademark rules in the Philippines

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Keeping up with amendments to trademark rules in the Philippines

Sponsored by

hechanova-400px.png
law-and-order-resized.jpg

Editha Hechanova of Hechanova Group overviews the Philippines’ recent overhaul of its trademark regulations, with significant repercussions for foreign applicants

The Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines recently amended the 2017 Rules and Regulations on trademarks, taking effect on February 1 2023. There were many procedural amendments affecting the requirements for filing trademark applications, but amendments which may create an additional burden for foreign applicants are as follows:

Composition of filing fees

 The filing fees shall consist of:

  • A basic fee;

  • A colour claim fee (if applicable); and

  • A publication for opposition fee.

The filing fee also includes the following, if applicable, and may be paid in advance: 

  • A convention priority claim fee;

  • A priority examination fee; and

  • An issuance and second publication fee.

The filing fee shall be deemed forfeited in favour of the government should the application not proceed to registration for whatever cause (Rule 501).

Submission of additional evidence during examination

If, during the examination of the application, the examiner finds actual basis to reasonably doubt the veracity of any aspect of the application, the examiner may require the applicant to submit sufficient evidence to remove doubt. This evidence may be in the form of a sworn statement of ownership and/or affidavit of good faith, among others (Rule 603).

Republication of mark amended by settlement or compromise agreement

In instances when the mark is the subject of a settlement and/or compromise agreement, and there was an amendment to the mark, its description, and/or specification, the amended mark may be republished for the public’s information (Rule 704).

Access to files by the public

Once the application has been published, access to files, including declaration of actual use and submitted proofs of use, may be made available to the public upon request and payment of the prescribed fees (Rule 702).

Assignment/transfer documents executed outside the Philippines

Assignment or transfer documents executed outside the Philippines must be authenticated by the Philippine Consulate Office at the place of execution. The past practice only required notarisation (Rule 1101).

Translation of documents executed outside the Philippines

The original copy of the document or assignment and its verified translation into English, if executed and notarised abroad, must be authenticated by the Philippine Consulate Office nearest the place of execution (Rule 1103).

Licence agreements must have quality control provision

A trademark licence agreement requires the licensor to ensure the quality control of the goods or services for which the mark is used. If the license contract does not provide for such quality control, or if such quality control is not effectively carried out, the licence contract shall be invalid. A licence contract shall have no effect on third parties until such quality control is ensured (Rule 1107).

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Herbert Smith Freehills outline what rights owners should be doing ahead of sweeping changes to EU design law
Deals between five more law firms and President Trump and an antitrust lawsuit against Amgen were also among the top talking points this week
US counsel explain how they win new cleantech IP business and how they’re navigating the industry’s challenges
Leaders at the IP firms, which have joined forces with backing from a PE investor, share their vision of building the number one pan-European IP practice
Firms will steer clients towards other ways of getting quicker examinations, but fear the ramifications of the USPTO’s decision
Melissa Haapala added that returning to client advocacy and the chance to work on patent litigation were reasons for returning to private practice
Michelle Clark, who has a generalist litigation background, plans to focus on IP disputes at Alston & Bird
Philips and Vivo have entered into a licensing agreement, putting an end to a five-year-old telecom SEP dispute in India
Stefan Müller discusses managing deadlines, the importance of reflection, and why IP is more than just a 'nice to have'
The three founders of the IP firm’s new US offering say they plan to offer a unique proposition in a market fixated by the billable hour
Gift this article