UK government bins UKIPO’s flagship AI reforms

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK government bins UKIPO’s flagship AI reforms

Westminster, London

IP minister George Freeman said on Wednesday that plans for a broad text and data mining exception would not go ahead and that further consultation was needed

The UK government has dropped plans to allow artificial intelligence developers to use copyright-protected material for training purposes, it was confirmed on Wednesday, February 1.

George Freeman, minister responsible for intellectual property, told the House of Commons that the government will instead begin a deeper consultation with rights owners over the country’s text and data mining (TDM) laws.

His comments were published in Hansard, the official record of activity in parliament.

The UKIPO said at the time the proposals would help achieve the government's plan to make the UK an AI superpower.

The office first announced proposals last June for a commercial copyright exception that would establish the UK as one of the most friendly jurisdictions for TDM.

But the plans were met with fierce opposition from some rights owners who said they would undermine the creative industries.

Julia Lopez, a minister at the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS), suggested last November that her department would be unlikely to support the proposals.

“We have written around to make it clear to other ministers that the proposals were not correct," he told parliament on Wednesday.

“I hasten to say that they were published after I left government, and it was a period of some turmoil. One of the lessons from this is to try not to legislate in periods of political turmoil,” he added.

The UKIPO’s plans were originally published on June 28 2022 but Freeman in fact resigned on July 7.

Managing IP has asked the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, in which Freeman serves, to clarify.

He added that the government had received a huge response which should have been picked up in the pre-consultation stage before the proposals were announced.

Freeman said the government would revisit the feedback it received on TDM and see if there were proposals that could command support from various stakeholders.

A UKIPO spokesperson said: "In a Westminster Hall debate, Minister George Freeman confirmed that following additional evidence of impact on the creative industries, ministers do not intend to move forward with the proposals on copyright and data mining announced last year.

"The Government’s approach to this issue is going through the usual decision making processes and an announcement will be made in due course."

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article