Lenovo infringed InterDigital 4G patent, Court of Appeal rules

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Lenovo infringed InterDigital 4G patent, Court of Appeal rules

Entrance to the Royal Court of Justice

The Court of Appeal backed a High Court ruling which found that InterDigital’s 4G SEP was valid and infringed by Lenovo

Chinese device maker Lenovo infringed a valid InterDigital patent essential to the LTE standard, the England and Wales Court of Appeal ruled yesterday, January 19.

The ruling, which has yet to be published online, is part of a long-running dispute between the parties over access to InterDigital’s 4G SEP portfolio. It upholds an earlier finding made by the England and Wales High Court in July 2021.

“We welcome this decision from the Court of Appeal which comes as further evidence of the foundational nature of our innovation and the quality and strength of our patent portfolio,” said Josh Schmidt, chief legal officer at InterDigital.

A judgment in a separate High Court trial, which seeks to determine a fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) royalty for the patents, is pending.

At the FRAND trial, which took place in February 2022, Mr Justice James Mellor denied InterDigital’s request for an injunction that would have barred Lenovo from selling infringing devices in the UK until the case was finalised.

A determination on a FRAND rate is expected this year. The highly anticipated judgment will be seen as a test of the UK’s merits as a rate-setting jurisdiction.

The UK is considered to be a more favourable venue for patent owners than other jurisdictions, such as China.

In 2020, the UK Supreme Court issued the landmark Unwired Planet judgment, which said UK courts had the right to set global FRAND royalties.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article