Lenovo infringed InterDigital 4G patent, Court of Appeal rules

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Lenovo infringed InterDigital 4G patent, Court of Appeal rules

Entrance to the Royal Court of Justice

The Court of Appeal backed a High Court ruling which found that InterDigital’s 4G SEP was valid and infringed by Lenovo

Chinese device maker Lenovo infringed a valid InterDigital patent essential to the LTE standard, the England and Wales Court of Appeal ruled yesterday, January 19.

The ruling, which has yet to be published online, is part of a long-running dispute between the parties over access to InterDigital’s 4G SEP portfolio. It upholds an earlier finding made by the England and Wales High Court in July 2021.

“We welcome this decision from the Court of Appeal which comes as further evidence of the foundational nature of our innovation and the quality and strength of our patent portfolio,” said Josh Schmidt, chief legal officer at InterDigital.

A judgment in a separate High Court trial, which seeks to determine a fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) royalty for the patents, is pending.

At the FRAND trial, which took place in February 2022, Mr Justice James Mellor denied InterDigital’s request for an injunction that would have barred Lenovo from selling infringing devices in the UK until the case was finalised.

A determination on a FRAND rate is expected this year. The highly anticipated judgment will be seen as a test of the UK’s merits as a rate-setting jurisdiction.

The UK is considered to be a more favourable venue for patent owners than other jurisdictions, such as China.

In 2020, the UK Supreme Court issued the landmark Unwired Planet judgment, which said UK courts had the right to set global FRAND royalties.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

News of the EUIPO launching a GI protection system, and WIPO publishing a review of the UDRP were also among the top talking points
A team from Addleshaw Goddard secured victory for the changing robe brand, following a trial against competitor D-Robe
Bird & Bird, Brinkhof and Bardehle Pagenberg were successful at the Court of Appeal, while there was a partial victory for Amazon in a case concerning audio recordings
Following the anniversary of Venner Shipley and AA Thornton's merger, Ian Gill recalls the initial trepidation about working for his spouse and offers tips for those who may find their personal and professional worlds colliding
Two partners have departed DLA Piper to join Squire Patton Boggs and Blank Rome in San Francisco and Chicago, respectively
Practitioners say a 32% rise in court fees is somewhat expected to maintain the UPC’s strong start, but some warn that SME clients could be squeezed out
Swati Sharma and Revanta Mathur at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas explain how they overcame IP office objections to secure victory for a tyre manufacturer
Claudiu Feraru, founder of Feraru IP, discusses the benefits of a varied IP practice and why junior practitioners should learn from every case
In the ninth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP & ME, a community focused on ethnic minority IP professionals
Firms that made strategic PTAB hires say that insider expertise is becoming more valuable in the wake of USPTO changes
Gift this article