Lenovo infringed InterDigital 4G patent, Court of Appeal rules

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Lenovo infringed InterDigital 4G patent, Court of Appeal rules

Entrance to the Royal Court of Justice

The Court of Appeal backed a High Court ruling which found that InterDigital’s 4G SEP was valid and infringed by Lenovo

Chinese device maker Lenovo infringed a valid InterDigital patent essential to the LTE standard, the England and Wales Court of Appeal ruled yesterday, January 19.

The ruling, which has yet to be published online, is part of a long-running dispute between the parties over access to InterDigital’s 4G SEP portfolio. It upholds an earlier finding made by the England and Wales High Court in July 2021.

“We welcome this decision from the Court of Appeal which comes as further evidence of the foundational nature of our innovation and the quality and strength of our patent portfolio,” said Josh Schmidt, chief legal officer at InterDigital.

A judgment in a separate High Court trial, which seeks to determine a fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) royalty for the patents, is pending.

At the FRAND trial, which took place in February 2022, Mr Justice James Mellor denied InterDigital’s request for an injunction that would have barred Lenovo from selling infringing devices in the UK until the case was finalised.

A determination on a FRAND rate is expected this year. The highly anticipated judgment will be seen as a test of the UK’s merits as a rate-setting jurisdiction.

The UK is considered to be a more favourable venue for patent owners than other jurisdictions, such as China.

In 2020, the UK Supreme Court issued the landmark Unwired Planet judgment, which said UK courts had the right to set global FRAND royalties.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article