INTA opinion: Why we are not losing focus with patent remit

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

INTA opinion: Why we are not losing focus with patent remit

INTA_focus_article_2000.jpeg

CEO Etienne Sanz de Acedo responds to a Managing IP opinion piece on the organisation’s increased focus on patents

In a recent opinion piece, senior reporter Max Walters wrote that INTA’s decision to target patent lawyers is intriguing but that the organisation should also decide what it wants to be.

My thanks to Managing IP for meeting with me recently to discuss the 2023 INTA Annual Meeting. We saw the recent opinion piece on some matters raised in the interview and we are, of course, more than happy to offer clarity.

The article focuses on one aspect of our conversation: why INTA is broadening its educational programme for the 2023 Annual Meeting to cover patents. This decision is in line with what our members are experiencing in their daily jobs. Increasingly so, they are working with not only trademarks but complementary rights. Their mandate is expanding, and they are expected to understand and participate in the business of the brand. No doubt, the role of trademark professionals has been evolving for some time and this is why we now refer to trademark practitioners as “brand professionals.”

Naturally, we want to provide our members with an educational programme that reflects this trend and helps them progress in their roles and advance in their careers. As your article notes, “we are constantly told that IP operates in a silo and that there is a disconnect between legal and business departments.” One of our goals is to break down these silos and raise the profile of IP among the c-suite, thereby also raising the profile of our members within their organisations. The Singapore Annual Meeting educational programme has two tracks: one on IP/legal – which covers the “traditional” IP topics that are still at the core of what we do – and one on the business of innovation, which takes a holistic view of brands and IP, including patents, which – of course – exist to protect innovation.

Finally, this should not be seen as INTA somehow losing its focus. As a mission-driven IP organisation, we are laser focused. Everything we do is undertaken in accordance with our carefully crafted strategic plan and corresponding implementation plan. And, as a member-driven association, our members are at the heart of everything we do. Our substantive (and geographic) expansion – and, indeed, our evolution – is helping us better serve the evolving needs of our members globally. INTA is an evolving organisation, but that does not mean we have lost our focus. In fact, the opposite is true.

We look forward to welcoming the global IP community, including patent professionals, to Singapore next May for the 2023 Annual Meeting and to engaging in productive and meaningful conversations around IP and brands and other areas of common interest.

 We hope this brings sufficient clarity on this matter.

 Etienne Sanz de Acedo is CEO of INTA, based in New York.


more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

One of the litigators expects that she’ll have to help clients navigate challenges posed by USPTO developments
Counsel explain what kind of ITC-related inquiries they’re getting from clients and why complaints at the forum were up in 2024
A ruling concerning a juicing machine, a tussle over a preliminary injunction and a new judge in Paris were among the top talking points this fortnight
John Squires has had a range of in-house and private practice experience, most recently in the IP group at Dilworth Paxson
President Donald Trump’s attacks on Perkins Coie and Covington & Burling should not go unchallenged
The combined entity, which is expected to offer IP services across Australia and New Zealand, will be called Jones Maxwell Smith & Davis
The Iconix v Dream Pairs dispute, to be heard at the UK Supreme Court, concerns trademarks owned by sports brand Umbro and the issue of post-sale confusion
The European IP team from Simmons & Simmons discusses the current approaches to IP enforcement against look-a-like or copycat products
Ten firms have each received more than 11 nominations, while more than 20 in-house counsel are up for awards
Yanfeng Xiong discusses 6am wake ups, honing his basketball skills, and how he prioritises tasks
Gift this article