Turkey: IP court rules on Red Bull’s colour marks in an infringement claim

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Turkey: IP court rules on Red Bull’s colour marks in an infringement claim

Sponsored by

gunpartners-400px.png
marcel-strauss-kozjvv0wy8e-unsplash.jpg

Zeynep Seda Alhas and Dilan Sıla Kayalıca of Gün and Partners consider the Turkish IP court’s ruling on an infringement case by Red Bull

Red Bull, the leading manufacturer and pioneer for energy drinks, encounters many trademarks, designs and trade dresses attempting to gain unfair advantage of Red Bull’s tremendous reputation worldwide.

Turkey is one market where Red Bull is the leader, so there has been a significant number of sales and market awareness. Therefore, the Turkish market is monitored carefully for infringing products, and brand protection strategy is applied properly by Red Bull.

In mid-2020, Red Bull determined that the products (‘Power Jaguar products’) are manufactured, marketed, and sold via both offline and online channels.

c58708d286fa4210bbcbbd603feda749

With the lawsuit initiated before the Civil IP Court of İzmir (IP court) on September 30 2020, Red Bull claimed trademark infringement and unfair competition against their products on the market, as well as their registered device and colour trademarks in Turkey, all incorporating a blue/silver colour combination. 

  

3dca53caba7547d28185cd3da71a7381

One of the defendants, mainly dealing with the marketing of Power Jaguar products, acknowledged marketing these products for four months in 2019 via its website, but denied trademark infringement and unfair competition allegations, claiming that they never actually sold Power Jaguar products.

The other defendant – the manufacturer of Power Jaguar products – relied on the dissimilarity of the word and graphic elements of the parties’ products and further questioned the distinctiveness of Red Bull’s blue/silver colour combination marks.

After hearing the parties’ arguments and defenses, the IP court allowed Red Bull’s request for an interlocutory injunction and decided for the seizure of Power Jaguar products as well as the promotional materials related thereto.

Red Bull enforced the interlocutory injunction wherever necessary and removed the infringing products from the market. The IP court rendered its decision in favour of Red Bull on September 29 2021 – within a year’s time, which is quick in comparison to the usual length of infringement actions.

The IP court evaluated that the use of colours on Power Jaguar products are similar to Red Bull’s trademarks, mainly to the reproduced Turkish trademark registration no. 2014 03556, and this is likely to  cause  confusion in the eyes of the average consumer.

The IP court acknowledged that the overall get-up of the Power Jaguar products creates trademark infringement and unfair competition and decided for the prevention of such on the relevant goods, plates, signboards and promotional materials, in addition to the seizure and destruction thereof.

 

 

4283bd51a9434c71a30a30b9e3c7ad0e

The protection granted to non-conventional trademarks in Turkey is not yet settled but this decision is remarkable as it shows the extent of protection that should be granted to colour combination marks, through Red Bull’s blue/silver colour mark.

The IP Court’s decision has not become binding yet; appeal processes are available.

 

Zeynep Seda Alhas

Partner, Gun + Partners

E: zeynep.alhas@gun.av.tr

 

Dilan Sıla Kayalıca

Senior associate, Gun + Partners

E: dilan.aslan@gun.av.tr

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Coke Morgan Stewart previously spent 10 years in various USPTO roles before joining O’Melveny in 2023
Law firm Stephens Scown secured victory for its client in a dispute over two cider products
The Court of Appeal said the UPC can award damages based on a national court’s infringement ruling, giving the last laugh to the lawyer who filed the case
AI
Robert Guthrie at Osborne Clarke runs through the government’s AI and copyright consultation and considers the expected challenges
A lawyer firing Meta as a client has reinforced why the industry should not shy away from losing business from those with questionable ethical standards, even if it comes at a cost
A blow for Getty ahead of its AI showdown with Stability AI and a licensing deal between Nokia and Samsung were among the big talking points this week
The IP Federation has written to the UPC Court of Appeal’s presiding judge ahead of a crucial decision on whether in-house lawyers and attorneys can represent their employers in litigation
A Boies Schiller Flexner partner explains how he helped toy company Tangle prevail in a copyright case concerning a kinetic sculpture
Awards
Submit your nominations for this year's WIBL Americas Awards by February 28
Awards
Research for the annual Women in Business Law Awards has begun – submit your entries by February 28
Gift this article