US backs COVID-19 IP waiver

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US backs COVID-19 IP waiver

wto-waiver-min.jpeg

Despite concerns from the pharma industry, the Biden administration sides with waiving IP rights to vaccines

The Biden administration yesterday announced its backing of a waiver for all intellectual property rights to COVID-19 vaccines, in what is a huge blow to the pharma industry.

The waiver was proposed in October at the World Trade Organization by India and South Africa. It covers not just IP for vaccines but for all COVID-19 technologies.

Related stories

“This is a global health crisis, and the extraordinary circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic call for extraordinary measures,” said Ambassador Katherine Tai, the US trade representative, in a statement released on Wednesday, May 5, announcing the US’s support of the waiver. 

“The administration believes strongly in intellectual property protections, but in service of ending this pandemic, supports the waiver of those protections for COVID-19 vaccines. We will actively participate in text-based negotiations at the World Trade Organization needed to make that happen,” she added.  

The waiver has been strongly opposed by the pharmaceutical industry, which argues that waiving IP would send a chilling signal to the industry and make it reluctant to invest in vaccine research the next time there is a pandemic. 

Stephen Ubl, president and CEO of trade group the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, said the decision will do nothing to increase access to vaccines – and warned that it will undermine American leadership in biomedical research. 

“In the midst of a deadly pandemic, the Biden administration has taken an unprecedented step that will undermine our global response to the pandemic and compromise safety. This decision will sow confusion between public and private partners, further weaken already strained supply chains and foster the proliferation of counterfeit vaccines.” 

The waiver has received strong support from global health charities and developing countries but is opposed by the EU and some wealthy nations.

The director general of the World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, called Biden’s support for the waiver a “monumental moment” in the fight against COVID-19. 

Global health care advocates argue that waiving IP rights to COVID-19 vaccines will not be enough to ensure equitable global access, which would also require know-how and technology transfer. 

Although the WHO created the COVID-19 Technology Access Pool for all IP and know-how related to COVID-19 over a year ago, it remains empty of relevant IP for vaccines and therapies. 

Biden’s support of the waiver does not guarantee it will be approved by the WTO’s TRIPS Council, which will continue to debate the initiative in the coming weeks. 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

News of two pharma deals involving Novo Nordisk and GSK and a loss for Open AI were also among the top talking points
Howard Hogan, IP partner at Gibson Dunn, says AI deepfakes are driving lawyers to rethink how IP protects creativity and innovation
Vivien Chan joins us for our ‘Women in IP’ series to discuss gender bias in the legal profession and why the business model followed by law firms leaves little room for women leaders
Partner Jeremy Hertzog explains how his team worked through a huge amount of disclosure from Adidas and what victory means for the firm
Evarist Kameja and Hadija Juma at Bowmans explain why a new law in Tanzania marks a significant shift in IP enforcement
In the wake of controversy surrounding Banksy’s recent London mural, AJ Park’s Thomas Huthwaite and Eloise Calder delve into the challenges street artists face in protecting their works and rights
Alex Levkin, founder of IPNote, discusses reshaping the filing industry through legal tech, and why practitioners’ advice should stretch beyond immediate legal needs
Cohausz & Florack, together with Krieger Mes & Graf von der Groeben, has taken action against Amazon on behalf of three VIA LA licensors
In the fourth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss unconscious bias in the IP workplace and how to address it
Greg Munt, who has moved from Griffith Hack to James & Wells after four decades, hails his new firm’s approach to client service
Gift this article