Africa: Mozambique joins ARIPO trademark system

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Africa: Mozambique joins ARIPO trademark system

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
Trademark Registration Concept

In an important development, Mozambique has joined the African Regional Intellectual Property Organisation’s (ARIPO) registration system for trademarks. It has been a member of the system for patents for some time.

ARIPO is a regional IP registration system that applies in what are mainly English-speaking African countries. The trademark component of the ARIPO system is regulated by a document known as the Banjul Protocol. On May 15 2020 Mozambique announced that it had acceded to that document with effect from August 15 2020.  

The effect of this is that it will in future be possible to designate any or all of the following countries in an ARIPO trademark application: Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, Liberia, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Sāo Tomé e Principe, Uganda, Tanzania (mainland) and Zimbabwe.

A few points are worth making:

· There have been doubts as to whether ARIPO trademark registrations are in fact valid in certain member countries. These doubts stem from the fact that some of the member countries, particularly so-called “British law countries”, have not specifically incorporated the Banjul Protocol into their national laws. No such doubts arise with Mozambique – not only is it not a British law country, but the legislation, the Mozambique Industrial Property Code of 2016, makes specific provision for what are referred to as  “regional registrations.”

· In Mozambique, trademark owners are required to file a Declaration of Intent to Use (DIU) every five years. The code says that these provisions will apply mutatis mutandis to regional registrations. Therefore companies that obtain trademark registration in Mozambique through the ARIPO system will need to file DIUs. It seems that the five-year term will run from the date on which ARIPO notifies the Mozambique Registry of having received an application designating Mozambique.

· Despite the fact that in Mozambique national trademark applications must be filed in Portuguese this appears not to be the case with ARIPO registrations, which can seemingly be filed in English.

Jennifer Colantoni

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Senior UK judges discussing the impact of AI on the judiciary, and the role of in-house IP lawyers during corporate transactions and carve-outs were among the top talking points
Tarun Khurana, founding partner of Khurana & Khurana, discusses juggling tasks, why every hour has a value, and the importance of ‘trusting the process’
Annual Meeting hears that IP firms are targeting hires with technical literacy in a fragmented landscape, and that those that build an online presence will distinguish themselves from the digital chaos
How law firms can secure themselves in a technology-driven IP landscape and how IP teams can develop future leadership were among the top talking points
The variety of winners demonstrates that the UPC is now a core benchmark rather than an experimental consideration, while junior lawyers are becoming more deeply involved in key work
The Indian government announcing a fee waiver for sports-related IP registrations, and the US adding the EU to its IP 'watch list' were also among major developments
Sources say the judge could return to a disputes or mediation-focussed role, though others have questioned whether the Texas court will remain a litigation hotspot in his absence
Sheppard, which has hired 14 IP partners in the last 12 months, has cited client demand for expert counsel in SEP, ITC, and district court disputes
Tingxi Huo joins our ‘Five minutes with’ series to discuss boosting the value of clients’ IP and the importance of reflection
Hefty legal teams assembled for a three-day hearing in what was the court’s first foray into SEPs since Unwired Planet v Huawei
Gift this article