High collecting society fees may be an abuse, says CJEU

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

High collecting society fees may be an abuse, says CJEU

The Court of Justice of the EU has ruled that the monopolies enjoyed by national collecting societies to collect copyright royalties are lawful, but that imposing high fees may amount to an abuse of a dominant position

The Court also ruled that a Czech law that exempted health establishments from paying royalties for music played to their guests was incompatible with the EU Copyright Directive.

The Court’s ruling, handed down today, relates to a row between Czech collecting society OSA and a thermal spa called Mariánské Lázně.

The dispute began when OSA tried to force the spa to pay royalties to it for providing guests with facilities to watch TV and listen to music in its rooms. Mariánské Lázně refused on the basis that Czech law allows medical establishments to make such broadcasts without paying royalties.

A court in Pilsen, the Krajský soud v Plzni, asked Europe’s top court whether the exemption granted to medical establishments by Czech law is compatible with EU law and whether the monopoly that OSA has within the Czech Republic for collecting royalties is compatible with the freedom to provide services and EU competition law.

It also asked the Court to consider a fundamental question about the way collecting societies operate across Europe: whether the monopoly that OSA has within the Czech Republic for collecting royalties is compatible with the freedom to provide services and EU competition law.

Today the Court decided that the monopoly that OSA has to collect royalties in the Czech Republic does amount to restriction on the freedom to provides services, since the spa was unable to choose to pay copyright fees to another collecting society. However, it said that the restriction is justified because there is no better way, at the moment, of protecting copyright in the EU.

Although the Court said that the monopoly granted by the Czech legislation to OSA is compatible with the freedom to provide services, the ruling may not be all good news for OSA. The Court said that if a collecting society charges fees that are appreciably higher than those levied in other member states, it could indicate that the collecting society is abusing its dominant position. Whether there is such abuse in this case will be for the referring Czech court to decide.

The ruling comes in the same month that EU member states adopted a directive on the way that collecting societies work. The directive on collective management of copyright and multiterritorial licensing of online music was adopted by the European Council unanimously last week (although some member states made statements about how they interpreted the new rules).

The directive will allow multi-territorial licensing of online music services and should increase the transparency of collecting societies by setting out minimum standards for the way they are governed and the timeliness with which they pay royalties to rights holders.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article