EPO’s Battistelli emphasises quality

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EPO’s Battistelli emphasises quality

The European Patent Office will not raise official fees above inflation for the next four years, President Benoît Battistelli said yesterday. Interviewed after addressing yesterday’s AIPPI IP Panel Lunch, he also promised “we will find a solution” to the controversial question of the level of renewal fees for the proposed Unitary Patent

A committee representing participating member states is discussing those fees, but has yet to publish any details. However, Battistelli said the most important criteria is that the Unitary Patent should be “business-attractive”. It must also be budget-neutral for the EPO, and reasonable for member states.

Battistelli, whose term was recently extended by the Administrative Council until 2018, said the fees would be known at least six months before the first Unitary Patents are granted, which is expected to be in 2016. “I think we could fix as a target June 2015,” he said.

He identified the successful implementation of the Unitary Patent as one of the achievements he would like to complete by 2018, along with an improved IT system, positive social relations with the Office staff, the maintenance of the EPO’s reputation for quality and the development of international cooperation. “We have increased transparency despite what some negative minds say. All the goals are known so everyone can measure them,” he said.

In his speech, Battistelli emphasised that the Office is investing in training and tools (such as the CPC, Patent Translate and Early Certainty from Search) to meet the challenges arising from a growing workload and greater complexity. It has also added 500 examiners in recent years.

He told the AIPPI Congress News that the EPO will maintain and improve quality by simplifying procedures and enabling examiners to focus on “the core issues of search, examination and opposition”. He said: “This improvement in quality is substantive and significant and is for the sake of the IP world system.”

Asked about criticisms of his initiatives, Battistelli said most people accepted the need for change and added: “The EPO is a great European success story and staff can be proud of what they have achieved.” He said the vote in the Administrative Council showed he has the support of member states and stakeholders.

Read the full interview with Battistelli here 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

With the US privacy landscape more fragmented and active than ever and federal legislation stalled, lawyers at Sheppard Mullin explain how states are taking bold steps to define their own regimes
Viji Krishnan of Corsearch unpicks the results of a survey that reveals almost 80% of trademark practitioners believe in a hybrid AI model for trademark clearance and searches
News of Via Licensing Alliance selling its HEVC/VCC pools and a $1.5 million win for Davis Polk were also among the top talking points
The winner of a high-profile bidding war for Warner Bros Discovery may gain a strategic advantage far greater than mere subscriber growth - IP licensing leverage
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Varuni Paranavitane of Finnegan and IP counsel Lisa Ribes compare and contrast two recent AI copyright decisions from Germany and the UK
Exclusive in-house data uncovered by Managing IP reveals French firms underperform on providing value equivalent to billing costs and technology use
The new court has drastically changed the German legal market, and the Munich-based firm, with two recent partner hires, is among those responding
Consultation feedback on mediation and arbitration rules and hires for Marks & Clerk and Heuking were also among the major talking points
Nick Groombridge shares how an accidental turn into patent law informed his approach to building a practice based on flexibility and balancing client and practitioner needs
Gift this article