Heirs of Dutch inventor sue Facebook over “like” button

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Heirs of Dutch inventor sue Facebook over “like” button

A patent holding company representing the heirs of a dead Dutch programmer is suing Facebook over its “like” button and other features

Rembrandt Social Media, acting on behalf of the late Joannes Jozef Everardus van Der Meer, claims Facebook’s success can be partly attributed to using two of Van Der Meer's patents without authorisation.

The patents relate to technologies Van Der Meer used to build a prototype social network called Surfbook before his death in 2004. Surfbook was a social diary which allowed users to share information with contacts and approve some features using a “like” button.

According to court documents, Van Der Meer was granted the patents in 1998, five years before Facebook was launched. Rembrandt now owns the patents.

Facebook won't like this

Rembrandt, which is being represented by Fish & Richardson, has filed a lawsuit in Virginia. Facebook’s attorneys have not yet been identified in court papers.

In a recent survey, Fish & Richardson was the top-ranked firm by number of federal district court patent suits handled in 2011.

Rembrandt claims that Facebook bears “a remarkable resemblance, both in terms of its functionality and technical implementation” to Surfbook. According to the suit, one of Facebook's patents refers to Van Der Meer's patents, demonstrating that Facebook was aware of them.

"We believe Rembrandt's patents represent an important foundation of social media as we know it, and we expect a judge and jury to reach the same conclusion based on the evidence," said Fish & Richardson lawyer Tom Melsheimer in a statement.

The papers also say Facebook is aware of the patents as it has cited them in its own applications to patent some social networking technologies.

A second social media company called Add This was also cited in the lawsuit.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article