UK drops plans for superfast patents

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK drops plans for superfast patents

The UK government has ditched plans to allow IP owners to pay for a 90-day patent processing service following a consultation with IP Office users

The Office published its consultation paper in April, asking users whether they would be willing to pay for an expedited service. Although some were in favour, others raised concerns that it could lead to the granting of invalid patents; that it would place a heavier burden on third parties to monitor applications and respond more quickly; and that early publication could prove a commercial disadvantage to applicants. Nor were respondents convinced of the benefits of paying a fee estimated at between £3,500 and £4,000 ($5,500 - $6,250) for a superfast service when the IPO already operates accelerated search and examination services.

The IPO received 22 responses from patent attorney groups, IP professionals and businesses. Now the government says that there appears to be insufficient demand for a new superfast service.

The plan for superfast patent grants was announced by UK Business Secretary Vince Cable in December as part of a series of measures the government was proposing to boost creativity and innovation. One week later the government revealed controversial proposals to widen the exceptions in the country’s copyright laws.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article