Del Monte succeeds in new gTLD challenge

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Del Monte succeeds in new gTLD challenge

American food producer Del Monte has become the first party to win a legal rights objection (LRO) to a new gTLD

In a split decision published this week, a WIPO panel found that there was “something untoward” about an application for the gTLD .delmonte filed by Del Monte International, based in Monte Carlo.

Del Monte

The objector, Del Monte Corporation, owns trade marks for Del Monte in 177 jurisdictions, with use going back to 1891.

Respondent Del Monte International owns trade mark registrations for Del Monte in South Africa, which date to 1966. It has also signed three licence agreements with Del Monte Corporation regarding use of the trade mark on certain products and in certain geographical areas.

Del Monte International had applied for the .delmonte string without notifying Del Monte Corporation or any of its other licensees.

No other parties applied for the string in this round.

The panel considered eight factors in its decision, regarding the registration and use of the mark, and any rights owned by the respondent.

Two of the three-person panel, Sebastian Hughes and William Towns, agreed that the gTLD applied for “creates an impermissible likelihood of confusion between the gTLD and the Objector’s mark”.

But panellist Robert Badgley dissented, saying it was “a close case” and a few points tipped the balance in favour of the respondent: “Respondent has a bona fide basis for owning this gTLD, even if Objector would also have a had a bona fide basis if it had been the applicant for this gTLD.”

Badgley also said he had favoured the acceptance of supplemental submissions from the parties, something which the majority refused. In particular, the South African trade mark certificates were not available to the panel.

The LRO procedure enables rights owners to challenge new gTLD applications that they believe take unfair advantage of, impair the distinctive character of, or otherwise create an impermissible likelihood of confusion with their mark.

Nearly 80 LROs have been filed. So far, 30 have been decided and Del Monte is the first one in which the objection has been upheld. Four cases have been terminated.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

While IP Australia’s updated manual could be favourable to computer-implemented inventions, stakeholders would like to see whether a consistent and reliable standard is followed during actual examination
UKIPO will remain a competitive option as long as efficient service continues
A future opt-out has not been ruled out, but practitioners warn that the UK could fall behind in the AI race
US patent lawyers say they are increasingly advising clients on China strategies as corporations seek to gain leverage in enforcement, licensing, and supply chain management
Mike Rueckheim reunites with 12 of his former Winston & Strawn colleagues as King & Spalding continues aggressive hiring streak
As global commerce continues to expand through e-commerce platforms and digital marketplaces, protecting brands has become a growing challenge for organisations worldwide. Counterfeiting, intellectual property infringement, and online brand abuse are increasing across industries, making brand protection strategies a critical priority for businesses.
Henrik Holzapfel and Chuck Larsen of McDermott Will & Schulte explain why a Court of Appeal ruling could promote access to justice and present a growth opportunity for litigation finance
A co-partner in charge says the UK prosecution teams are a ‘vital’ part of the firm’s offering, while praising a key injunction win
A team from White & Case has checked in on behalf of Premier Inn Hotels in a UK trademark and passing off case against a cookie brand
Litigation team says pre-trial work and a Section 101 defence helped significantly limit damages payable by ride-sharing firm Lyft in patent case
Gift this article