Del Monte succeeds in new gTLD challenge

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Del Monte succeeds in new gTLD challenge

American food producer Del Monte has become the first party to win a legal rights objection (LRO) to a new gTLD

In a split decision published this week, a WIPO panel found that there was “something untoward” about an application for the gTLD .delmonte filed by Del Monte International, based in Monte Carlo.

Del Monte

The objector, Del Monte Corporation, owns trade marks for Del Monte in 177 jurisdictions, with use going back to 1891.

Respondent Del Monte International owns trade mark registrations for Del Monte in South Africa, which date to 1966. It has also signed three licence agreements with Del Monte Corporation regarding use of the trade mark on certain products and in certain geographical areas.

Del Monte International had applied for the .delmonte string without notifying Del Monte Corporation or any of its other licensees.

No other parties applied for the string in this round.

The panel considered eight factors in its decision, regarding the registration and use of the mark, and any rights owned by the respondent.

Two of the three-person panel, Sebastian Hughes and William Towns, agreed that the gTLD applied for “creates an impermissible likelihood of confusion between the gTLD and the Objector’s mark”.

But panellist Robert Badgley dissented, saying it was “a close case” and a few points tipped the balance in favour of the respondent: “Respondent has a bona fide basis for owning this gTLD, even if Objector would also have a had a bona fide basis if it had been the applicant for this gTLD.”

Badgley also said he had favoured the acceptance of supplemental submissions from the parties, something which the majority refused. In particular, the South African trade mark certificates were not available to the panel.

The LRO procedure enables rights owners to challenge new gTLD applications that they believe take unfair advantage of, impair the distinctive character of, or otherwise create an impermissible likelihood of confusion with their mark.

Nearly 80 LROs have been filed. So far, 30 have been decided and Del Monte is the first one in which the objection has been upheld. Four cases have been terminated.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Firm says appointment of Nick McDonald will boost its expertise in cross-border disputes, including at the Unified Patent Court
In the final episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss the IP Inclusive Charter and the senior leaders’ pledge
Gift this article