Gurry to stand again as WIPO DG

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Gurry to stand again as WIPO DG

Francis Gurry intends to stand for a second term as WIPO Director General, Managing IP has learned

The Australian, who was elected in 2008 for a six-year term, confirmed today that he will allow his name to be put forward again.

His current term expires on September 30 2014. He is the fourth WIPO Director General, and has worked at the Organisation since 1985.

According to a circular sent last Friday, each WIPO member state has until December 6 this year to put forward one national as a candidate.

It is not yet clear if there will be other contenders for the position or, if so, who they will be.

The Coordination Committee will meet on March 6 and 7 next year to nominate a candidate for appointment. The successful candidate will be formally appointed at sessions of the General Assembly and the Assemblies of the Paris and Berne Unions on May 8 and 9, and will take up the post from October 1 2014.

The principles for nominating a director general state that the nomination should “if possible, be made by consensus”. But they also acknowledge that “voting will probably be a necessary means of building consensus for the nomination of a candidate” and set out how votes should proceed.

The Director General is normally appointed for a six-year term.

Gurry will be interviewed as part of Managing IP’s special supplement marking 40 years of the European Patent Convention, which will be online at the end of September.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A new transatlantic firm under the name of Winston Taylor is expected to go live in May 2026, and is likely to have a significant impact on Europe’s IP market
Geoff Steward and Rebecca Newman of Addleshaw Goddard explain how they secured victory in a rare ‘genericide’ case and why the work went beyond the courtroom
Nancy Frandsen looks back on her career, from answering a paralegal advert to expanding RCCB’s ‘entrepreneurial’ IP practice as a partner
The tie-up could result in the firm’s German and France-based teams, which both have strong UPC expertise, becoming independent
News of a slowdown in the UK’s clean energy IP landscape and an EPO report on unitary patent uptake were also among the top talking points
Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Gift this article