Australian IP statistics - influenced by China's National IP Strategy?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australian IP statistics - influenced by China's National IP Strategy?

Data published by IP Australia shows increasing activity from China and the Asia-Pacific region

Australia received 1,856 innovation patent applications in 2012, a 9% increase over 2011. Filings from China alone accounted for more than half of the increase.

By contrast, there were 26,358 invention patent applications in 2012, only a 3% increase over the previous year.

Invention patent filings from China also increased, though they account for just a small portion of total volume. Chinese patentees filed 510 invention patents in Australia last year, a 34% increase. South Korea, well known for its high tech industries, saw a 48% increase with 502 filings. In comparison, filings from European countries including Germany, France and the UK dropped, though overall volume is still considerably higher than either China or Korea. Germany for example, despite seeing a 6% decrease, still had 1,596 applications, enough for third most among foreign countries behind the US (11,378), and Japan (1,746).

The report is silent on the cause behind the increase in Chinese filings. Some critics of China’s IP policies have suggested that monetary incentives for domestic and international filings encourage low quality patents. Utility models, which are similar to innovation patents, drew particular attention. One lawyer explained that China’s incentives for PCT filings turn on filing rather than actually getting a patent, so some companies will file a PCT application, only to abandon it before reaching the national phase.

IP Australia’s data also shows that Australian companies are active overseas. Data for 2011 shows that Australian companies file 58% more patents in international markets when compared to domestic filings.

China’s importance as a growing market is reflected here. In 2012, it became the most popular location for Australian trade mark filings abroad with 2,571 applications. After China, Australian companies filed the most trade marks in New Zealand (2,215) and the US (2,015).

The Australia Intellectual Property Report 2013 can be found here.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Top talking points also included news of an appellate ruling concerning ‘Pisco’ and Indian drugmakers gearing up to launch generic versions of Ozempic as Novo Nordisk’s patent expires
The government’s keenly awaited view on AI and copyright has positive themes but leaves rights owners wanting, says Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard
While IP Australia’s updated manual could be favourable to computer-implemented inventions, stakeholders would like to see whether a consistent and reliable standard is followed during actual examination
UKIPO will remain a competitive option as long as efficient service continues
A future opt-out has not been ruled out, but practitioners warn that the UK could fall behind in the AI race
US patent lawyers say they are increasingly advising clients on China strategies as corporations seek to gain leverage in enforcement, licensing, and supply chain management
Mike Rueckheim reunites with 12 of his former Winston & Strawn colleagues as King & Spalding continues aggressive hiring streak
As global commerce continues to expand through e-commerce platforms and digital marketplaces, protecting brands has become a growing challenge for organisations worldwide. Counterfeiting, intellectual property infringement, and online brand abuse are increasing across industries, making brand protection strategies a critical priority for businesses.
Henrik Holzapfel and Chuck Larsen of McDermott Will & Schulte explain why a Court of Appeal ruling could promote access to justice and present a growth opportunity for litigation finance
A co-partner in charge says the UK prosecution teams are a ‘vital’ part of the firm’s offering, while praising a key injunction win
Gift this article