US Supreme Court to hear copyright first sale case

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US Supreme Court to hear copyright first sale case

supremecourtjustices45.jpg

The US Supreme Court is due to hear arguments in Supap Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case that addresses whether copyrighted goods manufactured and purchased abroad are subject to the first sale doctrine, today

The Court tackled the same issue in late 2010, when it considered Costco v. Omega. That case involved a copyrighted globe design on Omega watches manufactured in Switzerland and then sold to a distributor in Paraguay. The distributors then sold them to an American supplier, who sold the watches to Costco, a US discount store.

supremecourtjustices300.jpg

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals favoured Costco when it reversed a district court decision in 2008, and in December 2010 the Supreme Court delivered a 4-4 ruling, leaving many open questions.

In the Kirtsaeng case, Supap Kirtsaeng arranged for his family in Thailand to buy cheaper editions of textbooks printed there by Wiley & Sons. They then shipped them to him in the U.S., where he resold them for a profit on websites such as eBay.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the so-called first sale doctrine—which says that once a copyright owner sells a work, his rights in that work are exhausted—does not apply to copies manufactured outside of the United States, thereby making Kirtsaeng liable for copyright infringement. Kirtsaeng appealed to the Supreme Court, asking it to consider these questions:

Can such a foreign-made product never be resold within the United States without the copyright owner’s permission, as the Second Circuit held in this case? Can such a foreign-made product sometimes be resold within the United States without permission, but only after the owner approves an earlier sale in this country, as the Ninth Circuit held in Costco? Or can such a product always be resold without permission within the United States, so long as the copyright owner authorized the first sale abroad, as the Third Circuit has indicated?

AIPLA has filed an amicus brief in support of John Wiley & Sons. The Association argues that the first sale defense may not be raised, not because the books were made abroad, but because under the extraterritoriality doctrine the first sale right attaches only after the copyright owner has made its first sale in the United States.

Download the AIPLA Daily Report, published by Managing IP from Washington, DC from our conference newspapers page .

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Judge Alan Albright is to leave his role at the Western District of Texas, and could return to private practice
Stobbs has successfully seen off a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
After almost a quarter of a century, Marshall Gerstein has a new managing partner
Abbott winning another round against Sinocare and Menarini, and 'long arm' clarification on the UK's position within the UPC, were also among major developments
Maria Peyman, head of IP at Birketts, explains why the firm is adopting a ‘seamless approach’ for clients by integrating two of its practice areas
Matthew Swinn, who leads the firm’s IP practice, discusses why Mallesons is well-placed to remain a major IP force
Lawyers at A&O Shearman analyse developments regarding UPC’s long-arm jurisdiction, including its scope and jurisdictional limits
Michelle Lee discusses reaching milestones at the USPTO, AI’s role in legal work, and how to empower women in tech and IP
Executive chair Matt Dixon, who reveals a new associate hire, says the firm wants to offer a realistic pathway to partnership while avoiding the ‘corporate machine’ route
Mayer Brown’s role in cardiovascular technology dispute reflects how firms are pursuing precedent-setting cases to try and guide AI and patent law
Gift this article