K&L Gates finalises Australian tie-up

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

K&L Gates finalises Australian tie-up

K&L Gates has become the latest law firm to seal a deal with an Australian firm

The US firm is to merge with Middletons on January 1. The addition of Middletons’ 300 lawyers and four Australian offices will give the combined firm more than 2,000 lawyers in 46 offices.

K&L Gates says that part of the attraction of the deal was the rapid growth in investment in Australia from businesses in the region. Much of Australia’s inbound investment hails from Greater China, where K&L Gates has offices in Hong Kong and China.

US investors are also active in Australia, where their direct investment has topped $500 billion since 2005. The US firm said that the merger would allow the new firm to “brand itself as the legal solution for both inbound and outbound legal requirements involving Australia and the US”.

K&L Gates ranked in tier 3 for trade mark prosecution work by north-east US firms in this year’s Managing IP survey. Middletons ranked in tier 3 for both trade mark prosecution and contentious work in Australia and in tier 2 for copyright.

In recent years Australian-bound planes have carried plenty of foreign lawyers in search of a law firm tie-up, eager to service clients in a strong economy that has been largely unscathed by the global financial crisis.

Deals have included tie-ups between Herbert Smith and Freehills; Ashurst and Blake Dawson; China’s King & Wood and Mallesons; Norton Rose and Deacons; and Linklaters and Allens Arthur Robinson.





more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Firm says appointment of Nick McDonald will boost its expertise in cross-border disputes, including at the Unified Patent Court
In the final episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss the IP Inclusive Charter and the senior leaders’ pledge
Gift this article