Why copyright termination heralds a perfect storm

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Why copyright termination heralds a perfect storm

For those AIPLA Annual Meeting attendees who (mis)spent their youth dancing to the Village People’s disco classic YMCA, it might come as something of a shock to realise that the band released the song almost 35 years ago

The song’s age is significant, because section 203 of the U.S. Copyright Act gives authors the right to terminate grants of copyright made after January 1, 1978, as long as they exercised the grant at least 35 years ago.

Kevin C. Parks of Leydig Voit & Mayer spoke at an AIPLA Annual Meeting session on copyright entitled Copyright Openings and Closings-Open Source, the OPEN Act, and Termination Rights. He explained why the law has the makings of a perfect storm—or at least a perfect storm of litigation, using YMCA co-writer Victor Willis as a case study.

Willis (the Village People’s “cop” and lead singer) assigned his rights in a series of Village People songs to a music publishing company soon after writing them. Willis married a lawyer in 2007 (“a good move,” said Parks), and later filed a notice of termination on publisher Scorpio Music. It responded by seeking a declaratory statement that the notice had been improperly filed, claiming that since Willis did not represent a majority of the joint authors of the songs in suit he could not unilaterally terminate the assignment.

But in May, a California court ruled that Willis was entitled to reclaim his copyright in the songs since he had transferred his copyright interest separately from the other authors.

“Although it was a narrow holding, it was definitely round one to the creative community,” said Parks. Now other music is subject to termination notices, with Bob Dylan, Tom Petty and Kris Kristofferson among those seeking the return of their rights.

Yet the ruling may not strip music publishers of their catalogues, said Parks. Not all artists want to manage and exploit their own rights: it’s a complex, time-consuming business that many are happy to leave to specialists. There may also be commercial advantages to leaving all of their copyrights in one place. That means that many artists will choose to negotiate new, more generous terms for their copyright assignments rather than reclaim the rights.

Parks left the audience with his own, updated version of Willis’ song: “Young man,” he said. “It’s fine to (terminate) YMCA.”

Download the AIPLA Daily Report, published by Managing IP from Washington, DC from our conference newspapers page.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Anousha Davies, associate and trademark attorney at Birketts, unpicks how the university’s reputation enabled it to see off a proposed trademark for ‘Cambridge Rowing’
IP lawyers, who say they are encouraging clients to build up ‘tariff resilience’, should treat the risks posed by recent orders as a core consideration in cross-border licensing
Regulatory changes and damages risks are prompting Canadian firms and clients to opt for settlements in generic and biosimilar cases
News of Via Licensing Alliance adding two new members and Nokia’s proposal to extend interim licences to Warner Bros Discovery and Paramount were also among the top talking points
A new claim filed by Ericsson, and a request for access to documents, were also among recent developments
Cooley and Stikeman Elliott advised 35Pharma on the deal, which will allow GSK to get its hands on S235, an investigational medicine for pulmonary hypertension
Simon Wright explains why the UK should embrace the possibility of rejoining the UPC, and reveals how CIPA is reacting to this month’s historic Emotional Perception AI case at the UK Supreme Court
Matthew Grady of Wolf Greenfield says AI presents an opportunity in patent practice for stronger collaboration between in-house and outside counsel
Aparna Watal, head of trademarks at Halfords IP, discusses why lawyers must take a stand when advising clients and how she balances work, motherhood and mentoring
Discussion hosted by Bird & Bird partners also hears that UK courts’ desire to determine FRAND rates could see the jurisdiction penalised in a similar way to China
Gift this article