A new approach to TM infringement?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

A new approach to TM infringement?

Is the infringement test under Article 5 of the EU Trade Mark Directive so complex that an alternative approach would be better?

That question, posed by Roland Mallinson of Taylor Wessing, sparked considerable debate at the 26th annual MARQUES conference, held in Athens last week.

Speaking in a panel on “Exceptional Signs”, Mallinson discussed referential use of trade marks, in particular where the same mark and same goods/services are concerned.

Citing cases such as Adam Opel, Interflora and Bellure, he suggested that the infringement test established by the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has become too complex. A better approach might be to make the infringement test clearer and then clarify the defences available.

This would be in line with suggestions made in the Max Planck report, said Mallinson.

That report is now being considered by the European Commission as it prepares recommendations for changes to the Trade Mark Directive and Trade Mark Regulation. However, the proposals have been delayed and now may not be public until next year.

The MARQUES conference attracted over 600 attendees and the theme of the educational sessions was “Sign of the Times”.

Other panels addressed the challenges posed by technological developments such as augmented reality-based advertising and Google Goggles; non-traditional marks; enforcement, particularly online; domain name developments; and recent CJEU case law.

There were also presentations from WIPO and OHIM and workshops on topics including traditional knowledge and plain packaging, as well as excursions and receptions featuring Greek food and culture.

Detailed reports from the conference are available on the MARQUES Class 46 blog.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article