UK reveals plain pack thinking

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK reveals plain pack thinking

The UK government has taken a step closer to introducing a plain packaging regime for cigarettes by launching a consultation on standardised tobacco packaging

The consultation document was published yesterday by the Department of Health. It suggests that standardised packaging could consist of no branding, a uniform colour, or standard font and text for any writing on the pack.

But the government confirmed that tobacco packs would not actually be plain. Instead, they would be required to have coloured picture warnings and brand names would still appear in a standardised form.

The move comes as tobacco companies fight the Australian government in the courts after the country’s parliament voted to introduce plain packaging for tobacco products from the end of 2012. They are arguing that the government has illegally appropriated their IP rights.

Australia is also facing a challenge at the WTO after Ukraine filed a complaint against it last month under the TRIPs Agreement.

The UK government said yesterday it has an “open mind” about introducing standardised packaging.

“Through the consultation, we want to understand whether there is evidence to demonstrate that the standardised packaging of tobacco products would have an additional public health benefit, over and above existing tobacco control initiatives. We also wish to understand what other effects there may be should standardised tobacco packaging be introduced.”

The consultation document does not specifically address issues relating to trade marks, but it does ask for comments about the likely impact of plain packaging on trade and competition.

The consultation is open until July 10.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The tie-up could result in the firm’s German and France-based teams, which both have strong UPC expertise, becoming independent
News of a slowdown in the UK’s clean energy IP landscape and an EPO report on unitary patent uptake were also among the top talking points
Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Gift this article