OHIM seeks new president of its Boards of Appeal after Maier moves to the IP Observatory

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

OHIM seeks new president of its Boards of Appeal after Maier moves to the IP Observatory

paul-maier-45.jpg

OHIM is on the search for a new president of its Boards of Appeal after revealing that Paul Maier is to leave the post to oversee the Office’s new IP Observatory

Paul-Maier-OHIM

Three years ago the European Commission set up a European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy as a platform for coordinating actions to protect IP rights throughout the EU. In March EU member states agreed to rename it the European Observatory on Infringements of Intellectual Property Rights and hand its management to OHIM, the Alicante-based office that grants Community trade marks and designs.

Maier will become the Observatory’s director in mid-January. He has worked at OHIM from its earliest days, joining as chief adviser to the President of the Office in 1995. He subsequently took responsibility for preparing OHIM for EU enlargement and was made director of the Designs Department in 2002. He was nominated President of the Boards of Appeal by the Council of Ministers in December 2005 and confirmed for a second mandate in May 2010.

His new role will see him leading the Observatory’s mission: to understand better the value of IP; improve understanding on the impact of infringements of IP (by establishing a transparent methodology collecting reliable data); help raise awareness of the impact of IP infringements; develop training programmes for people involved in the enforcement of IP, including in non-EU countries; and disseminate information about best practices.

A spokesman for OHIM told Managing IP that there will be an open recruitment process for Maier’s successor. The Office’s Administrative Council will oversee the selection process and draw up a shortlist of candidates that will be submitted to the Council of Ministers.

He said that even if Maier’s replacement is not in place by min-January, the Boards of Appeal, which each have their own chairperson, will function as normal.

As part of establishing the Observatory, OHIM has revised its management structure. The Observatory will incorporate the OHIM Academy, the Office´s training and knowledge-sharing hub.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
Gift this article