Taiwan: Utility model patents in Taiwan

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Taiwan: Utility model patents in Taiwan

Filing a utility model application for an invention can be a quick way to obtain patent rights in Taiwan. A utility model application will mature into a registration with a duration of 10 years from the filing date as soon as the formality requirements are fulfilled. However, as a utility model application filed in Taiwan is not subject to a substantive examination looking at novelty and inventive step, before a utility model patent holder can enforce his right against an infringer, he needs to ask Taiwan's IP Office to produce a technical evaluation report in which prior art references are cited (if any) and the relevance of these to each claim is specified. The scope of the claims of a utility model patent might need to be restricted in light of the references cited by the IP Office.

According to current practice, a petition for amendment filed independently of an invalidation action is only subject to a formality examination. Taiwan's IP Office now adopts a different threshold from that of substantive examination. During a formality examination, the IP Office would generally consider a slight modification of the wording in the recitations of the claims to be a substantial change. This makes it quite difficult for the patent holder to obtain a favourable technical evaluation report when it comes to cited art.

Moreover, a utility model patent holder might need to submit a petition for claim amendment before the IP Office if he filed an infringement lawsuit and the accused infringer, in turn, filed a defence of patent invalidity as a countermeasure. In this case, the petition can be dismissed for failing the formality test even if the scope of the amended claims does not go beyond the originally filed claim or is narrower than the original claims.

To ensure the stability of utility model patent rights and to limit problems arising from filing claim amendments during a civil litigation procedure or application for a utility model technical evaluation report, both of which are subject to a formality examination, the IP Office is about to revise relevant regulations. It proposes prohibiting the filing of petitions for amendment of the claims of utility model patents in the absence of an invalidation action, an application for a technical evaluation report or a pending civil litigation case. Moreover, amendments to the claims of utility model patents shall be examined substantively. In the hope of establishing a sound claim amendment system for utility model patents, the IP Office is ready to revise patent law if a consensus can be reached at the forthcoming public hearings.

Yen-bin Gu


Saint Island International Patent & Law Offices7th Floor, No. 248, Section 3Nanking East RoadTaipei 105-45, Taiwan, ROCTel: +886 2 2775 1823Fax: +886 2 2731 6377siiplo@mail.saint-island.com.twwww.saint-island.com.tw

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The treatment of USPTO employees has been haphazard and shows a misunderstanding of how the IP office works and the challenges it faces
Jeff Kuester discusses why IP is the perfect party conversation and why excitement and stress are two of a kind
IP counsel Anna Bien and global marketing manager Lesia Tarasenko explain how the brewery secured an EUTM and the lessons they learned
Federal employees, including at the USPTO, have been ordered to justify their roles by outlining what they accomplished in the last week
Philips wins more than $2m in damages as Delhi High Court comes down hard on Indian DVD makers for wasting the court’s time
Public documents in a long-running feud between Brainchild and CPA Global provide more information about how CPA manages patent renewal costs
Tony Chen reveals the expansion goals for his new fully virtual practice, Chen IP, but why he won’t be cold-calling anyone
Daniel Tarr explains why returning to his former firm could help him establish his personal brand, and predicts what’s on the horizon for AI litigation
A call to reinstate the European Commission's controversial SEP proposal and a trademark row involving Stanley cups were also among the top talking points
Susman Godfrey and Polsinelli secured victory for power systems manufacturer Vicor at the US International Trade Commission
Gift this article