The Philippines: A poem as proof of intent

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

The Philippines: A poem as proof of intent

Finally, the highly publicised case regarding the construction of the 49 storey residential condominium building called Torre de Manila (pictured) as marring the view of the statue of the Philippines' national hero Jose Rizal has come to an end. On April 25 2017, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition for injunction filed by the Knights of Rizal (KOR), a "civic, patriotic, cultural, non-partisan, non-sectarian and non-profit organisation" against the developer DMCI Homes Inc, City of Manila, National Commission for Culture and the Arts, et al (GR No 213948). The petition was filed by KOR on September 12 2014 which argued that the completed Torre de Manila would "forever ruin the sightline of the Rizal Monument in Luneta Park" since it would "loom at the back and overshadow the entire monument, whether up close or viewed from a distance". The KOR also argued that the building is nuisance per se; and that the Rizal Monument as a National Treasure is entitled to full protection of the law.

From Mocha Balita

In dismissing the petition, the Supreme Court held that there is no law prohibiting the construction of the Torre de Manila; that there is no allegation or proof that the Torre de Manila project is "contrary to morals, customs and public order" or that it brings harm, danger or hazard to the community; there is nothing that disallows the construction of a building outside the boundaries of a historic site or facility, where such building may affect the background of a historic site. In this case, the Torre de Manila stands 870 metres outside and to the rear of the Rizal Monument and "cannot possibly obstruct the front view of the Rizal Monument". Likewise, the Torre de Manila is not in an area that has been declared as an "anthropological or archealogical area" or in an area designated as a heritage zone, cultural property, historical landmark or national treasure by the National Historical Commission.

As a final word, the Supreme Court quoted some lines from Rizal's poem Mi Ultimo Adios, which expressed Rizal's wish to die facing the rising sun:

Yo muero cuando veo que el cielo se colora Y al fin anuncia el dia tras lobrego capuz

(I die just when I see the dawn break, Through the gloom of night, to herald the day)

History would show that at his execution, Rizal was made to stand facing west towards Manila Bay, with his back to the firing squad like a traitor, despite his request that he face his executioners. When he was shot, he turned around to face the east, falling on his back with the rising sun on his face.

The Supreme Court said: "The Rizal Monument is expressly against Rizal's own wishes. That Rizal's statue now stands facing west towards Manila Bay, with Rizal's back to the east, adds salt to the wound ... On the other hand, if Rizal's statue is made to face east, as Rizal had desired when he was about to be shot, the background – the blue sky above Manila Bay – would forever be clear of obstruction, and we would be faithful to Rizal's dying wish."

Editha R Hechanova

Hechanova & Co., Inc.

Salustiana D. Ty Tower

104 Paseo de Roxas Avenue

Makati City 1229, Philippines

Tel: (63) 2 812-6561

Fax: (63) 2 888-4290

editharh@hechanova.com.ph    

www.hechanova.com.ph

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Gift this article