United Kingdom: Trade mark application for Should’ve

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

United Kingdom: Trade mark application for Should’ve

The well-known optical retail chain Specsavers have been hitting the headlines in the UK again. This time it is not for their successful court battles with British supermarket retailer and Wal-Mart subsidiary, Asda, which set an important precedent for the protection of colour trade marks, but for filing an application with the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) to have Should've and Shouldve registered as trade marks in classes 9, 10, 16, 35, and 44.

Specsavers applied to the UKIPO on July 18 2016 to register the two single words as a series of trade marks. This stems from the strapline of "should've gone to Specsavers" which Specsavers has been using since 2003 and has registered as an EU trade mark since 2007.

The UKIPO have accepted and published the application, which means that third parties had until October 12 to oppose the application. Indeed, six separate parties filed notices of threatened oppositions against the application within four days of the application being published, which would indicate that opposition proceedings against this application are likely.

Unsurprisingly, the UKIPO's acceptance of this application has met with severe criticism, as this could ultimately provide a monopoly in the single, commonly-used words, and prevent other companies from using the words as registered. Further criticism has been fired at the UKIPO for the broad scope of the five classes of goods and services for which registration was sought, seemingly beyond the remit of optical services, for example printed matter (class 16), which could provide considerable clout over printed retail services. The UKIPO has previously accepted single, commonly used words for registration but for far narrower specifications, such as Probably for classes 32 (lager; beer), 33 (alcoholic beverages) and 43 (services for providing food and drink), Always and Never, also to a narrow list of classes.

Beyond these concerns, Specsavers' decision to register Should've and Shouldve is relevant business strategy in light of the significant use and reliance of marketing on social media. Hashtags are commonly used to catalogue content, note trends and generate conversation and topics of discussion in broad sectors of the markets. For example, the hash tag #should've recently accompanied the full Specsavers catchphrase. Clearly any resulting registration for Should've and Shouldve will help Specsavers to control use of these marks in the full spectrum of social media.

Undoubtedly, many people will be monitoring Specsavers' application, with an increase in similar trade mark applications for single words likely should it be successful.

Chapman

Helga Chapman


Chapman + Co18 Staple GardensWinchester SO23 8SRUnited KingdomTel: +44 1962 600 500  info@chapmanip.com  www.chapmanip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Lavoix provide an overview of the UPC’s approach to inventive step and whether the forum is promoting its own approach rather than following the EPO
Andrew Blattman, who helped IPH gain significant ground in Asia and Canada, will leave in the second half of 2026
The court ordering a complainant to rank its arguments in order of potential success and a win for Edwards Lifesciences were among the top developments in recent weeks
Frederick Lee has rejoined Boies Schiller Flexner, bolstering the firm’s capabilities across AI, media, and entertainment
Nirav Desai and Sasha S Rao at Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox explore how companies’ efforts to manage tariffs by altering corporate structures can undermine their ability to assert their patents and recover damages
Monika Żuraw, founder of Żuraw & Partners, discusses why IP should be part of the foundation of a business, and taking on projects that others walk away from
Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Susan Keston and Rachel Fetches at HGF explain why the CoA’s decision to grant the UPC’s first permanent injunction demonstrates the court’s readiness to diverge from national court judgments
IP, M&A, life sciences and competition partners advised on deal that brings together brands such as ‘Huggies’ and ‘Kleenex’ with ‘Band-Aid’ and ‘Tylenol’
Stability AI, represented by Bird & Bird, is not liable for secondary copyright infringement, though Fieldfisher client Getty succeeds in some trademark claims
Gift this article